[publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 05:28:21 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684
Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(mospina at redhat.co
| |m)
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> 2009-01-05 00:28:19 EDT ---
Manuel, would a UTS #10 collation routine conforming to
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ be sufficient to sort a flat glossary?
i.e. a glosslist or glossary without glossdivs?
e.g. of the form:
Term1: definition1
Term2: definition2
Term3: definition3
Where TermX may or may not be translated, but definitionX is always translated.
Cheers, Jeff.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the publican-list
mailing list