[publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 05:28:21 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684


Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(mospina at redhat.co
                   |                            |m)




--- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn <jfearn at redhat.com>  2009-01-05 00:28:19 EDT ---
Manuel, would a UTS #10 collation routine conforming to
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ be sufficient to sort a flat glossary?

i.e. a glosslist or glossary without glossdivs?

e.g. of the form:

Term1: definition1
Term2: definition2
Term3: definition3

Where TermX may or may not be translated, but definitionX is always translated.

Cheers, Jeff.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the publican-list mailing list