[publican-list] [Bug 475684] Find solution for using Glossaries with publican

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475684


Manuel Ospina <mospina at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(mospina at redhat.co |
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #4 from Manuel Ospina <mospina at redhat.com>  2009-01-20 01:59:56 EDT ---
It would be sufficient for a phonetic alphabet. I'm not sure how it would work
in other systems. How does this algorithm sort non-alphabetical writing
systems?  
I have added Chester for his opinion. 

(In reply to comment #2)
> Manuel, would a UTS #10 collation routine conforming to
> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ be sufficient to sort a flat glossary?
> 
> i.e. a glosslist or glossary without glossdivs?
> 
> e.g. of the form:
> 
> Term1: definition1
> Term2: definition2
> Term3: definition3
> 
> Where TermX may or may not be translated, but definitionX is always translated.
> 
> Cheers, Jeff.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.