[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [publican-list] [Bug 616142] New: RFC: building only part of a book by altering xrefs

Douglas Silas wrote:
On the whole, using conditions for this purpose is probably not worth the effort and trouble. That is why I was looking for a more Publican-centric solution.

I can't imagine an argument that would move us to break DocBook compatibility in the way you suggested. Not saying it wouldn't happen, but it would have to be a brilliant argument.

If you want functionality that requires DTD changes then you should be presenting your ideas upstream and trying to get it in to DocBook.

If anyone has any other ideas on how to do this kind of thing without breaking DocBook compatibility, now is the time to speak up!

Cheers, Jeff.

Jeff Fearn <jfearn redhat com>
Software Engineer
Engineering Operations
Red Hat, Inc
Freedom ... courage ... Commitment ... ACCOUNTABILITY

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]