[Pulp-list] CLI for Search

Jason Dobies jason.dobies at redhat.com
Mon Nov 15 14:28:45 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/15/2010 09:30 AM, John Matthews wrote:
> Is there a benefit to having search operations all located under a search module, as it's implemented today?  Or is it better for a user if they have search calls spread out through the module they use.  For example:
> 
> Option #1:
> pulp-admin search packages
> pulp-admin search errata
> pulp-admin search consumers
> 
> versus 
> 
> Option #2:
> pulp-admin package search
> pulp-admin errata search
> pulp-admin consumer search
> 
> Option #1 is currently implemented for packages, but it sounds like the team might prefer Option #2.  I'd like to confirm the desire, then will change if needed.
> 

+1 for option 2, it feels more consistent with the rest of the UI. #1
would make sense if our UI was structured like:

pulp-admin list repos
pulp-admin list consumers
pulp-admin create repo
pulp-admin create consumer
etc...

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list


- -- 
Jason Dobies
RHCE# 805008743336126
Freenode: jdob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM4UOdAAoJEOMmcTqOSQHCcmQIALgsXslqPzrbGtdcsLKQEWg7
/Mtyc+vLYBaLMXbygaMbhg55Dgmy/m2EI5EOedrPrCUM9wOLiAxTh0L1yGS7ZOj8
Ny1rK8/J6bYsiDulbUynNXyuLhJCdfDU7fKTuWgNLuWbxRJ1W6TBUcz71F9yORzp
apkbeE9sFfpJl4XAInm17I/7YSsvdPdM/Wlvhi8WPi9PlcQA8hw7OXNBOZNFC1Bk
JH2NBMFwT78epncWYwGivM/YvfBH2CAhdk5YzZ+PgLf9gN383nX9C2/ma9awB0H1
BcVg4c6zCepAzAMiVfjB1gcNGbG0MBQK/tdS23k28zfpO6wTmKmWrOOmaQMBrHY=
=PPl5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Pulp-list mailing list