[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Pulp-list] Roles and Permissions docs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

IMO, they should both go under "Pulp Users" since they are typically
thought of as user-related things. Personally I tend to think of
users/roles as the same concept and I'd be inclined to bundle
permissions in there as well.

What's the rationale for it being its own section?

On 02/09/2011 01:37 PM, Jason L Connor wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm in the process of putting together documentation for the roles and
> permissions portions of authorization that was pushed yesterday. 
> 
> I'm thinking that roles should go under the current user documentation
> and permissions should be its own new section in the user guide.
> However, I'm looking for your thoughts on this. Any other suggestions or
> even simple confirmations are welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list


- -- 
Jay Dobies
RHCE# 805008743336126
Freenode: jdob
http://pulpproject.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUt96AAoJEOMmcTqOSQHC5PwIAJrdFK/XsFhK/rx+iGCY7SNB
it0luEw88HQZOpJO8x6P6yr2LKjCXCLrUNxLlPndd5vR8hRFwapSEwREaN/Wjprw
/tWNCX4FoSYPjB3EMzTezEfjuZZKcdtGaGz9GcHftDc7/0XqqYn18U/6gEaRwW+b
zZ4wVRTDJUs0tHBgDemvsGq3NSvCzHy6sZft5RFl8hJFCSteGdf3344aISKGFIcz
zjRXYFFsnT6qQb6SV2vIPednj8LJ+K0XYXQ8myZTASHEDu7dZ+sniytvncmL/nkT
71THwJ1q5Cro+1zyIZG8FfmvPT5Rl6mF/0mCZ8O+UOPfiD8C56rXKTrIkau1w0Y=
=wJkx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]