[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Pulp-list] Test mock framework



On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:54:35PM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote:
> Nosetests has been used since the beginning, but I'm not sure it was necessarily for any specific reason. I'd be up for hearing about alternatives. And the RHEL thing isn't an issue, we fully control the Hudson boxes. 
> 

I'm not advocating not using nose, a mocking solution would be in addition to
nose.  Nose is great for test discovery, running, coverage, etc.  But, it
doesn't provide any solution for mocking objects, function calls, and
the like.

--
-- James Slagle
--


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]