On 03/30/2011 08:37 AM, Todd B Sanders wrote:
On 03/29/2011 10:40 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
On 03/29/2011 10:28 AM, Todd B Sanders wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/ProductRepos
Would it make sense to keep repo create as it is and add another
feed type, so instead of
$ pulp-admin repo bulk-create
--feed=yum:http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp --groupid=pulp
we would do,
$ pulp-admin repo create
--feed=bulk:http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp
--groupid=pulp
This was there is always a single create command to run instead of
another bulk-create command.
~ Prad
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
This brings up another issue. We are going to need to support file
sync very very soon. Also, we need to consider the fact that Pulp
repositories can hold multiple content types (i.e. rpms and files).
As you an I discussed briefly, we might want to move to something like:
$ pulp-admin repo create --id=pulp-f13-i386 --name=pulp-f13-i386
--feed=http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/fedora-13/i386/
--type=yum,file
With this, how would you suggest we handle the "bulk-create"?
-Todd
1. we can isolate feed type from content; To me feed type doesnt
necessarily mean content type. I could have a yum or local feed which
pulls down rpms, distributions and Isos. So we could do something like
* pulp-admin repo create --id=pulp-f13-i386
--feed=bulk/yum/local/clone:http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/fedora-13/i386/
--content=rpm,deb,file
which mean repo pulp-f13-i386 supports rpms,debs and files and nothing
else.
2. Or we can go the route where we pull everything unless restricted
* pulp-admin repo create --id=pulp-f13-i386
--feed=bulk/yum/local/clone:http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/fedora-13/i386/
--ignore=deb
this would pull everything in the url structure unless we specifically
skip a type.
Let us know If anyone has any other thoughts
~ Prad