[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Pulp-list] Bulk Repo Creation - Thoughts/Comments?

On 03/30/2011 05:49 PM, Mike McCune wrote:
On 03/30/2011 01:22 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
Hash: SHA1

On 03/30/2011 04:22 PM, Jason L Connor wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:55 -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
I'd say we drop "rhn", and determine local from feed url;
->  remote and file:// ->  local


yea if we can drop rhn; that should make things easy to determine.

~ Prad

Yes please. I've always found the syntax of (yum|rhn|local):<uri>

Same. I haven't had time to really think about this thread, but I agree
that that part has always thrown me off. I still forget it from time to

what happens when the remote repo is a deb repo? Or the remote repo is just an http collection of files? or if the remote repo is a maven repo? etc... http or https doesn't necessarily always mean the remote location is a yum based repo.

hence, the requirement for a type. I'd hesitate to drop type all together if we want to make pulp support multiple types of repositories in the future but we could *default* to yum for http/https based repos but allow for overrides if a type is specified.


Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list redhat com

Totally agree Mike. My suggestion is to (1) drop the prefix on the feed and (2) add a --content-type attribute (i.e. yum, deb, file, puppet, etc)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]