[Pulp-list] Puppet in the CLI

[Jeff Ortel]

On 08/22/2012 07:50 AM, Ashley Penney wrote:
> I prefer this new option, I think.  It's straightforward and keeps a
> single binary for interaction.  It sets out what kind of data you are
> using right from the start and makes that very clear.  It works for
> me!
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 08/22/2012 02:43 AM, Jason Connor wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm also leaning toward option 2, version 2.
>>>
>>> I tried mental exercise on a 3rd version. Namely and auto-type detecting
>>> script, but you hung up on the help flag alone, so I don't think it'll fly.
>>>
>>> O2V2 is, imo, the cleanest.
>>
>>
>> I thought of a O2V2 this morning where we keep a single pulp-admin script
>> but branch at the root of the commands:
>>
>> pulp-admin rpm repo ...
>> pulp-admin puppet repo ...
>> pulp-admin generic repo ...
>>
>> It's basically the same concept of individual trees of commands, but a
>> single script. I'm still leaning towards O2V2, but figured I'd throw that
>> out there.

+1

>>
>>
>>> Jason L Connor
>>> linear on freenode #pulp
>>> http://pulpproject.org/
>>> RHCE: 805010912355231
>>> GPG Fingerprint: 2048R/CC4ED7C1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/GCCLITypes
>>>>
>>>> When first adding the RPM extensions, I knew we'd have to figure
>>>> something out when we supported Puppet but decided to hold off on the
>>>> decision and see how things took shape.
>>>>
>>>> It's time to revisit the CLI structure and how to handle the fact that
>>>> the Pulp team is now providing support for 2 different plugin packs, keeping
>>>> in mind that that number may grow depending on what other types of content
>>>> we decide to bite off and maintain as a team (or get contributed).
>>>>
>>>> The page above describes my thought process in how to handle our admin
>>>> CLI with multiple types. I included some chat conversations with the
>>>> community on what they think as well.
>>>>
>>>> It's pretty clear reading it which way I'm leaning. I'd like to come to a
>>>> conclusion following the scrum meeting tomorrow, but I don't want to wait
>>>> that long to hear any brilliant ideas you have on the issue since I'll
>>>> probably start down a path this afternoon. So please reply to this or me
>>>> personally if you have a strong opinion in any direction.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jay Dobies
>>>> Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
>>>> http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-list mailing list
>>>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jay Dobies
>> Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
>> http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>