[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Pulp-list] Should we move pic to under src?




----- Original Message -----
> For anyone who doesn't know, under playpen/webservices there's a
> module
> called pic. The intention is to use it in an interactive python shell
> (ipython) to be able to make web service calls against Pulp. It's
> pretty
> handy for debugging stuff outside of the CLI.
> 
> I was thinking we should move it somewhere in src under the pulp.com
> package so it's included just about everywhere (clients and server).
> It
> might be useful for supporting Pulp as it's, IMO, easier than
> wget/curl.
> If it's packaged with the server code it's as simple as importing it
> and
> using it, but it also doesn't hurt anything to just sit there if they
> don't use it.
> 
> Even if they don't have ipython installed we can still provide people
> with one-liners they can run from the command line. Something like:
> 
> $ python -c "from pulp.common import pic; pic.connect();
> print(pic.GET('/repositories/'))"
> (200, [])
> 
> Anyone feel strongly one way or another?
> 
>

+1


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]