[Pulp-list] Should we move pic to under src?

[Jay Dobies]

On 02/14/2012 02:35 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
> For anyone who doesn't know, under playpen/webservices there's a module
> called pic. The intention is to use it in an interactive python shell
> (ipython) to be able to make web service calls against Pulp. It's pretty
> handy for debugging stuff outside of the CLI.
>
> I was thinking we should move it somewhere in src under the pulp.com
> package so it's included just about everywhere (clients and server). It
> might be useful for supporting Pulp as it's, IMO, easier than wget/curl.
> If it's packaged with the server code it's as simple as importing it and
> using it, but it also doesn't hurt anything to just sit there if they
> don't use it.
>
> Even if they don't have ipython installed we can still provide people
> with one-liners they can run from the command line. Something like:
>
> $ python -c "from pulp.common import pic; pic.connect();
> print(pic.GET('/repositories/'))"
> (200, [])
>
> Anyone feel strongly one way or another?

I moved it under pulp.common:

http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=pulp.git;a=commit;h=e8932b6886825433542973c66e88f6fa5758ff9d


-- 
Jay Dobies
Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org