I resolved this by deleting all of the repos, recreating the master "live" and clones. However, I still have clones with blacklists that appear to have
the blacklisted files in their repo metadata as they show in the consumer's offered packages to update.
If this is occurring, consider it a bug. The packages on the f/s should not be duplicated. Please open a bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pulp)
with the specific details; include the pulp version. Assuming the checksum type for both repos is the same.
On 01/19/2012 01:19 PM, Golden, Joel wrote:
If a clone points to the same file set of the master repo, why is the amount of disk space consumer 2X?
Joel Golden, RHCE
Unix Support / Senior Systems Administrator
The content contained in this electronic message is not intended to constitute formation of a contract binding
tw telecom. tw telecom will be contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized officer, of a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express application of its tariffs. This message is intended only for the use of the individual
or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list redhat com