[Pulp-list] Pulp in production

[Alejandro Cortina]

we had the issues you mentioned with 2.8.3, updated to 2.8.4 and so far
(+/- 1 month I guess) is working smooth.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:57 AM, <acjohnson at pcdomain.com> wrote:

> I am looking for recommendations on what release of Pulp is recommended
> for production deployments.
>
> We have been running Pulp 2.3 in production for the past year and are
> currently building out new production infrastructure to deploy our new
> production Pulp environment on top of.
>
> We planned to deploy the latest stable release of Pulp which at the time
> was Pulp version 2.8.3.
>
> We have Pulp 2.8.3 running on the new infra and are currently dealing with
> various pulp tasks hanging with State: Waiting and Start Time: Unstarted
>
> I've noticed that the Katello project has recently upgraded their stable
> release (3.0 currently) to use Pulp 2.8.4 packages located here:
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/3.0/pulp/el7/x86_64/
>
> And previously Pulp 2.6 was used as the stable packages for Katello
> (skipping Pulp 2.7 altogether).
>
> For production deployments is Pulp 2.8.x the recommended release to use,
> or should people be deploying Pulp 2.9.x in prod, or just skip Pulp 2.9.x
> and use for devel environments only?
>
> Hopefully this question makes sense to you. It would be nice if the Pulp
> project had some sort of LTS release (Long Term Support) to help guide
> users to the most stable branch of development.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160721/a2790e3e/attachment.htm>