[Pulp-list] Version 2.8 bug 1749 and production usage of Pulp

[Brian Bouterse]

Vaclav,

That issue is likely due to data that is in your database that was
upgraded. A fresh install with no previously upgraded data won't have
this problem.

It may be useful to other users to have you run the data validation tool
on your upgraded data and report what it shows. Posting your findings
onto issue #1749, or a link via e-mail or in #pulp on IRC would be helpful.

Thanks,
Brian


On 03/23/2016 01:02 PM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
> With completely fresh installation it is ok, simple upgrade from latest
> GA 2.7 to 2.8 + database update and restart didn't help. Data validation
> tool wasn't used, but I can try it (if it's valuable for you).
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com
> <mailto:bbouters at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Vaclav,
> 
>     The bug #1749 was fixed in the 2.8.0 Pulp release. What version of Pulp
>     are you running? Also we don't support upgrading from one beta to
>     another. Did you upgrade your system directly from a GA release to
>     another GA release?
> 
>     Did you run the pre-upgrade data validation tool[0]? What results did it
>     show? That tool can help identify data quality issues which sounds like
>     what you are experiencing. I believe you can run it post-upgrade too and
>     still get information about your problem from it.
> 
>     If you are running 2.8.0 and are still having issues, consider getting
>     on #pulp on freenode and asking more in there.
> 
>     [0]:
>     http://pulp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-guide/release-notes/2.8.x.html#before-upgrade
> 
>     -Brian
> 
>     On 03/21/2016 03:21 AM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >  I still hitting this bug https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1749 and
>     unable to
>     > use latest version. And seems that it's not critical for anybody else
>     > than me :-)
>     >
>     > So I'm a quite curious is there anybody else who use Pulp for Centos6
>     > consumers ? How many users really use Pulp ? is it stable enough
>     to use
>     > it for production systems ?
>     >
>     > Vasek
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Pulp-list mailing list
>     > Pulp-list at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list at redhat.com>
>     > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>     >
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pulp-list mailing list
>     Pulp-list at redhat.com <mailto:Pulp-list at redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- May the fox be with you ...
>    /\
>   (~(
>    ) )         /\_/\
>   (_=---_(@ @)
>     (          \   / 
>     /|/----\|\  V
>     " "     " "
> 
>