[Pulp-list] Failed upgrade pulp 2.10 -> 2.12

Kodiak Firesmith kfiresmith at gmail.com
Sat Mar 18 20:21:06 UTC 2017


<3 Michael, <3 Brian - I'm on #pulp right now w/ Michael, but I'm also in
the DB and removed a single user account I found with no defined roles [],
and tried running the pulp-manage-db to no avail.  I'll work on a redacted
paste.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> It sounds like issue 2591 was not environmental for the original reporter.
> Can you show the output of the current users table with the password
> redacted? You can do that with:  db.users.find().pretty()  in a mongo shell
> connected to the Pulp db. Could you also paste that same output from your
> db backup (also redacted), so we can compare? In fact, I will reopen 2591
> and untriage it, but can you post both of this output on the issue? From
> that output we could determine what the right mongo command to run is for
> the workaround.
>
> Also are there many usernames in use in your environment?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Kodiak Firesmith <kfiresmith at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>> After having no problem upgrading beta, I took on a weekend upgrade of
>> prod and just my luck, can't upgrade the DB.
>>
>> Sadly, I'm no programmer and certainly not a MongoDB whiz so I'm a bit
>> dead in the water after hitting this:
>>
>> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/PADDDdL112VnEiJOVJqell
>> 5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
>>
>> My recovery plan was to basically just run a 'yum history undo ##', but I
>> discovered I can't roll back to 2.10-1 easily because the packages no
>> longer seem to exist on the internet - I should have checked and mirrored
>> them before taking on the upgrade, shame on me and an opportunity to
>> improve my future process to be sure.
>>
>> Anyhow, google brings me exactly one hit for the pasted error above:
>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2591
>>
>> ...But I'm not so sure on messing around with the Pulp production DB,
>> despite having backups it still makes me wary.
>>
>> Anyone have any advice?
>>
>> Thanks much!
>>  - Kodiak
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20170318/e3860359/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list