[Pulp-list] Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19

Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) bli111 at bloomberg.net
Mon Apr 20 23:12:12 UTC 2020


We are still seeing the same errors on 8 repos out of total of 270. The sync job failed immediately when we tried to resync. However, if we delete and recreate the repo, we don't see the errors when we sync.
 

From: pulp-list at redhat.com At: 04/20/20 12:01:43To:  pulp-list at redhat.com
Subject: Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19

Send Pulp-list mailing list submissions to
        pulp-list at redhat.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 pulp-list-request at redhat.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
 pulp-list-owner at redhat.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pulp-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error (Dennis Kliban)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:25:42 -0400
From: Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com>
To: Bin Li <bli111 at bloomberg.net>
Cc: pulp-list <pulp-list at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error
Message-ID:
        <CAPmNiups_9X_xW2nfNM2qXt_QSd-KWFuJ731L7YV56cMDby-pA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

The issue does not have any steps to reproduce it. Have you been able to
consistently reproduce the issue with a specific repository? Does it go
away the next time you perform the sync?

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:03 AM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <
bli111 at bloomberg.net> wrote:

> Thanks Brian. I filed an issue https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6463
>
> From: bmbouter at redhat.com At: 04/07/20 15:59:11
> To: Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK ) <bli111 at bloomberg.net>
> Cc: pulp-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] pulp 3.2.1 duplicate key error
>
> I heard another developer report a similar issue, but we couldn't
> reproduce it. Could you file this as an issue also please?
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) <
> bli111 at bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
>> Noticed we have a few errors when running sync.
>>
>> "error": {
>> "description": "duplicate key value violates unique constraint
>> \"core_repositoryversion_repository_id_number_3c54ce50_uniq\"\nDETAIL: Key
>> (repository_id, number)=(59eb02b1-edab-46e3-a69b-d69a8b314f20, 2) already
>> exists.\n",
>>
>> What could be the cause of this? How can we resolve it?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20200420/6c0bc1a7/atta
chment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

End of Pulp-list Digest, Vol 125, Issue 19
******************************************


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20200420/a5e7a4e9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list