[Rdo-list] Packstack Icehouse changes

JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 07:41:57 UTC 2014


Have you installed centos-SCL repo?

Regards,
---
JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso


2014-06-27 9:30 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77 at gmail.com>:

> No more luck :(
> I can't even install foreman due to this bug =>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091564
> any idea how to make it work?
>
>
> 2014-06-26 18:03 GMT+02:00 Kun Huang <gareth at openstacker.org>:
>
>> btw, the lastest reference should be this one?
>>
>>
>> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/5/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploy_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Madko <madko77 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks, I will give it a try. I hope with more luck than packstack.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-06-26 16:59 GMT+02:00 JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
>> > <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> Foreman is the right tool! ;)
>> >> Red Hat has great docs about it:
>> >>
>> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Installation_and_Configuration_Guide/part-Deploying_OpenStack_with_Foreman.html
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> ---
>> >> JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-06-26 16:52 GMT+02:00 Madko <madko77 at gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2014-06-26 16:44 GMT+02:00 Jakub Ruzicka <jruzicka at redhat.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 26.6.2014 15:33, Perry Myers wrote:
>> >>>> > On 06/26/2014 09:23 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
>> >>>> >> remove the feature the packstack have been own is not good idea,
>> and
>> >>>> >> would affect many user.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Part of the reason for the reduction in scope of Packstack is due
>> to
>> >>>> > resource constraints for the team that is working on Packstack,
>> Puppet
>> >>>> > and Foreman.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > If we could get some folks outside of Red Hat to become upstream
>> >>>> > contributors and more importantly maintainers of Packstack, then
>> that
>> >>>> > would alleviate some of the scope creep concerns and perhaps
>> Packstack
>> >>>> > could be expanded a bit.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > But right now with the majority of the effort solely coming from a
>> >>>> > handful of Red Hatters, we just don't have the bandwidth and hence
>> the
>> >>>> > scope of Packstack was reduced to be purely an all-in-one/demo
>> tool.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well, it was created as a proof-of-concept/demo tool in the first
>> place.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you want sophisticated multi-node installer, packstack isn't the
>> >>>> right tool for that job.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Good to know, what is the right tool for that job?  I mean multi-node
>> >>> installer.
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers
>> >>>> Jakub
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Rdo-list mailing list
>> >>>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>> >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> --
>> >>> Edouard Bourguignon
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Rdo-list mailing list
>> >>> Rdo-list at redhat.com
>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Edouard Bourguignon
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Rdo-list mailing list
>> > Rdo-list at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Edouard Bourguignon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rdo-list/attachments/20140627/30a9a03a/attachment.htm>


More information about the rdo-list mailing list