[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Rdo-list] Follow up on Ceph and TripleO discussion @ Austin



David, Karanbir, thoughts please?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo ltgfederal com> wrote:
> Jewel has orders of magnitude improvements vs prior versions, so I’ll vote
> to have the latest release if possible in the shorter timeframe.
>
> IB
>
> __
> Ignacio Bravo
> LTG Federal, Inc
> www.ltgfederal.com
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:08 PM, François Cami <fcami redhat com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If that makes more sense for RDO, I'll prioritize rebuilding Jewel for
> CentOS (Storage SIG) next week instead of validating the latest Hammer
> rebuild.
>
> Ignacio, Leif, David, does that work better for you?
>
> François (CentOS Ceph Storage SIG maintainer)
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Leif Madsen <lmadsen redhat com> wrote:
>
> Does this seem like something that makes sense for a Copr setup? (I ask this
> because because I'm a nub when it comes to Copr; I read about it today and
> it sounds like perhaps the appropriate tool?)
>
> Leif.
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms redhat com> wrote:
>
>
> From my past discussions with the Ceph team, it doesn't look like
>
> there are plans to provide upstream self-contained repositories for
> Ceph, at least in the short term.
>
> I reached out today to the maintainer of the Ceph storage SIG repository
> [1].
> Right now, Hammer is available and is included when you install
> "centos-release-openstack-mitaka" on CentOS.
>
> There are no plans to provide the Infernalis release but they really
> want to ship Jewel as it will be a long lived and supported version.
> The current estimate for Jewel brings us to the summer.
>
> It's all down to time constraints, it seems like they could use some
> help if anyone is interested in providing assistance with this
> initiative.
>
> If nothing has changed, the only dependency that isn't provided out of
> the box is leveldb.
> Perhaps another alternative would be to bring leveldb into the base OS
> repositories but that seems unlikely unless someone is willing to do
> that work.
> This is definitely uncharted territory for me.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/CentOS-Storage-SIG/ceph
>
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Ignacio Bravo <ibravo ltgfederal com>
> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Following up on the discussion today on etherpad at the RDO, is there
> any
> workaround to install Ceph Jewel (which requires epel) until
> download.ceph.com includes no dependencies to epel?
>
> Thanks,
> IB
>
>
>
> __
> Ignacio Bravo
> LTG Federal, Inc
> www.ltgfederal.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Leif Madsen | Partner Engineer - NFV & CI
> NFV Partner Engineering
> Red Hat
> GPG: (D670F846) BEE0 336E 5406 42BA 6194  6831 B38A 291E D670 F846
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdo-list mailing list
> Rdo-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list
>
> To unsubscribe: rdo-list-unsubscribe redhat com
>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]