[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [rdo-list] OVS 2.8 in CentOS SIGs WAS Re: OVS 2.7 on rdo





On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer redhat com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq redhat com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec redhat com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Numan Siddique <nusiddiq redhat com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Alan,
>> >
>> > OVS 2.8 is now availalbe [1] and we would like to have it in RDO.
>> >
>> > Is it possible to have the OVS 2.8 rpms in candidate repo. I will update
>> > the
>> > patch [2] and make sure it passes so that we don't see any regressions
>> > during update.
>> >
>> > [1] -
>> >
>> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2017-September/045235.html
>> > [2] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473191/
>>
>> Hi Numan,
>>
>> I've rebased two patches we have in RDO [3] rebuilds, on top of
>> Timothy's Fedora 28 RPM [4] and it almost worked, only ppc64le arch
>> build [5] failed with:
>>
>> |
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc/lib/librte_eal.a(eal_common_options.o):
>> In function `eal_plugins_init':
>> |
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:240:
>> undefined reference to `dlopen'
>> |
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/openvswitch-2.8.0/dpdk-stable-17.05.1/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c:242:
>> undefined reference to `dlerror'
>> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>
>> ppc64le folks, please help!
>>
>
>
> Thanks Alan. Hope the build would be resolved soon.

I looked at this briefly.  The compile error is odd, but we wouldn't
even hit that if the initial testcase run completed successfully.
There are two unexpected failures:

2355: ovn -- dns lookup : 1 HV, 2 LS, 2 LSPs/LS       FAILED (ovn.at:6812)
2364: ovn -- ensure one gw controller restart in HA doesn't bounce the
master FAILED (ovn.at:8480)

This is odd. Are the tests failing consistently ? I will have a look. 

Thanks
Numan
 

Not sure why those two failed.

josh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]