MBR not suitable as boot device; installing to partition

Oliver Hookins ohookins at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 07:56:06 UTC 2005


On Apr 2, 2005 3:07 AM, Rick Stevens <rstevens at vitalstream.com> wrote:
> Oliver Hookins wrote:
> > I'm setting up a kickstart installation environment for RHEL-ES-4, and
> > created a kickstart file using the kickstart configuration generator.
> > When I boot the new machine from the network using the kickstart file
> > it generates the message:
> >
> > * MBR not suitable as boot device; installing to partition
> >
> > And proceeds through the rest of the installation. After rebooting,
> > the machine hangs at the GRUB prompt. Something is not right here, the
> > commands used in the kickstart file with regard to the disks and
> > bootloader are as follows:
> >
> > bootloader --location=mbr
> > zerombr yes
> > clearpart --all --initlabel
> >
> > It is installing to SCSI disks in a RAID1 configuration but that
> > shouldn't make any difference to how GRUB is installed - it hasn't
> > even reached any partitioning information at this stage. Any ideas?
> > This definitely wasn't an issue under RHEL-ES-3.
> 
> You didn't say how the RAID is set up nor which kind of controller its
> on.  ES4 is based on Fedora Core 3 and a 2.6 kernel.  RAID controllers
> are handled a bit different under the 2.6 kernel--especially if it's
> an I2O-based RAID controller.  Check the docs.

Sorry, it is actually just software RAID. As it turns out it is a
known bug - when I filed it in Bugzilla it was marked as a duplicate.
Guess we'll have to wait until the next release for a fix and work
around this with scripts.

Regards,
Oliver




More information about the Redhat-install-list mailing list