Package Manager Question

[Karl Pearson]

On Tue, March 16, 2010 11:26 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 06:44 PM, Karl Pearson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I use Fedora on my server (email, web, etc.) and have been using Linux
>> Mint on my desktop and laptop.
>>
>> I've noticed something that has caused me to ask this question. First,
>> what I've noticed:
>>
>> When I update a package using that package's 'Check For Update' feature
>> on
>> the Help menu (Virtualbox is a prime example), Linux Mint, which uses
>> dpkg, the debian package manager, automatically updates the repository
>> indexes on my PC and shows the package installed when I run Synaptic.
>>
>> I don't remember YumX ever doing this, or any other RPM front-end, or
>> rpm
>> itself from the commandline. If I didn't install a package from the
>> repositories, rpm didn't know it was there.
>>
>> Do you know if this has been "fixed" (if it's actually broken)?
>>
>> I'm going to install a new server with CentOS soon, and have toyed with
>> the idea of using it as my workstation OS as well.
>
> What you're experiencing is standard yum practice.  It doesn't know
> about repos unless it has a config for it.
>
> A config is a stanza inside a file in the /etc/yum.repos.d directory.
> A stanza starts with the name of the repo in square brackets, e.g.:
>
> 	[fedora]
>
> Following that is a number of things which control how yum interacts
> with the repo.  One of the most important is:
>
> 	enabled=[0|1]
>
> If the stanza has "enabled=1", then yum will check and/or use it. If
> it has "enabled=0", then it's ignored.  Default is "enabled=0" for any
> stanza that doesn't have it explicitly defined.
>
> You can force a disabled repo ("enabled=0") to be scanned by adding:
>
> 	--enablerepo=<repo-name-glob>
>
> on the yum command line before any commands.  Example:
>
> 	yum --enablerepo=livna update
>
> The standard way of checking for updates interactively is by doing a
>
> 	yum update
>
> It'll tell you if there are things that need updating.  If there are,
> it'll ask you if you want to do the update now.  If you way "yes", the
> the update process begins.
>
> If you want just want to check for updates non-interactively (e.g. in a
> script), use:
>
> 	yum check-update
>
> which will return a return code of 100 if there are things that need
> updating, 1 if an error occurs and 0 if there are no updates.

I've been using yum for years, and like it, but that wasn't my question.
I'm wondering if yum has the same capability (yet) that dpkg has of
knowing what's been installed, even if it's done through the package's own
update process, like Virtualbox or any other package that has a [Help >
About > CheckForUpdates] feature.

Karl


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, C2 Hosting          ricks at nerd.com -
> - AIM/Skype: therps2        ICQ: 22643734            Yahoo: origrps2 -
> -                                                                    -
> -     I.R.S.: We've got what it takes to take what you've got!       -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> Redhat-install-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to:
> redhat-install-list-request at redhat.com
> Subject: unsubscribe
>


---
Karl Pearson
Karlp at ourldsfamily.com
Owner/Administrator of the sites at
http://ourldsfamily.com
---
"To mess up your Linux PC, you have to really work at it;
 to mess up a microsoft PC you just have to work on it."
---
 Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have
 for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
 --Benjamin Franklin
---
 Children seldom misquote you. In fact, they usually
 repeat word for word what you shouldn't have said.
---