Web proxy through a frame

[Eric Wagar]

I had thought of VNC.  But, I don't have a static IP, only dynamic.  I
could put VNC on the server, and install Mozilla, but I'd rather only
install what's needed on the server.

And, only web ports go to the proxy.  They are not allowed out through
the firewall unless they come from the proxy server.


On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:39:36 -0800, "Michael Scully"
<agentscully at flexiblestrategies.com> said:
> Eric:
> 
> 	Do all ports go through the proxy?  Can you use VNC outward?  If
> that's so, setup a home PC that's on broadband, and keep VNC server
> exposed.
> Then you can take over that PC and get out to what ever you like.
> 
> Scully
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Eric Wagar
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Subject: Re: Web proxy through a frame
> 
> > > I run an adult site that is blocked by my day employers's proxy.
> > > 
> > > I'd like to know of a proxy I can install on my server that will create
> > > a frame, which the frame will be where the content will be displayed.
> > 
> > There are a few free anonymizer services out there.  Here's one that I
> > have never used:
> > http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/cgi-proxy.htm
> > 
> > I will give you this warning, since you obviously need it.  I happen to
> > manage one of my firms proxy servers.  I'm also a member of our security
> > committee.  If you were to try this at my employer, you would be
> > terminated with cause immediately upon discovery.  Do not think that by
> > doing something like this that you will get away with it.  You might,
> > but if you don't, the consequences are fairly serious.  You are setting
> > your firm up for serious legal liability and you are abusing your
> > Internet privileges.  Frankly I hope you get caught and immediately
> > terminated.  What you do with your own system on your time is up to you
> > and the law - do your home work at home and your work work at work.  Do
> > not mix the two.
> 
> I appreciate your concern, even if it was unsolicited.  The proxy
> service was only implemented because of auditors, not because the
> company wanted to do it.  Liability no, abusing priviledges, yes.  Not
> to seem to overly rationalize it, but what I do is just the tip of the
> iceberg.  And, if didn't get away with it, was caught, and written up,
> then it would never happen again.
> 
> Now, on to my post.  I have seen the site you mention above, but
> unfortunately, they are not what Iam looking for.  I would rather
> control the site I am using as the intermediary.  Thus, I would be near
> assured of it's access.
> -- 
>   Eric Wagar
>   eric at deadhookers.org
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-- 
  Eric Wagar
  eric at deadhookers.org