Apaceh2 with SSL and multiple virtual host

Jim Herrick jim at bleedpurple.com
Sun Mar 28 09:00:59 UTC 2004


The name-based virtual host that's your "_DEFAULT" virtual host (or the one
that's served when the IP is used) would have to be the one that will use
SSL.

Jim

-----
If you can read this, thank a teacher....
If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier!
-----
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts at ewilts.org>
To: <techlist at voyager.phys.utk.edu>; "General Red Hat Linux discussion list"
<redhat-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: Apaceh2 with SSL and multiple virtual host


> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:23:42PM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > On Friday 26 March 2004 07:30 pm, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
> > > Sorry Reuben if I misunderstood, are you trying a named virtual host
> > > over SSL?
> >
> > Moby,
> > I have virtual hosts  working before (there are 3). I am trying to set
so that
> > one of those virtual host runs over ssl. The rest will be happy with
just
> > running over plain HTTP. Is that possible, and how?
>
> You can't have a named-based virtual host over ssl.  You must have an
> IP-based virtual host for this.  In order to figure out what host name
> you're using for ssl, you need to decrypt the header.  In order to
> figure out what certificate to use, you need to know the virtual host
> name.  That's a catch-22.  That's why it won't work.
>
> -- 
> Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
> Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
>
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>





More information about the redhat-list mailing list