Routing and bandwidth problem
Crucificator
crucificator at xnet.ro
Mon May 17 07:57:33 UTC 2004
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 06:36 5/5/2004, you wrote:
>
>> From: "Crucificator" <crucificator at xnet.ro>
>> > why not use virtual adapters with ip's from different networks and use
>> > only one card?
>>
>> Because then you'd be sharing 100Mb between the four networks.
>> Rodolfo said
>> he wanted to give each client 100Mb connection to the router/server.
>> Still,
>> it's not a *bad* idea, perhaps using two dual-ip cards...
>
>
> I'm not hung up on everyone getting a 100 Mbps pipe to the server,
> since that particular capability would be used less frequently.
> Getting even 10 Mbps to each tenant would be just fine as far as
> bandwidth goes, so we're OK there.
>
> The reasons I had for thinking of separate cards were mostly related
> to the thought that security would be better by keeping each tenant
> totally separate, the odds of one tenant managing to get onto the
> other's network would be much lower by not connecting them to the same
> switch, and that I could assign different subnets to different tenants
> via DHCP and then clearly see where a problem is just by looking at
> the IP address. I had also assumed that limiting bandwidth per
> interface would be easier than doing it per IP address, but that's
> just a WAG.
>
> I don't see a way to do this with virtual IP addresses, especially the
> assigning different subnets via DHCP bit. I *am* open to suggestions,
> though... that's why I posted here. :-)
>
Why do you want to use DHCP? Why not use static IP's?
-------------------------------------------------------
Connex scaneaza automat toate mesajele impotriva virusilor folosind RAV AntiVirus.
Connex automatically scans all messages for viruses using RAV AntiVirus.
Nota: RAV AntiVirus poate sa nu detecteze toti virusii noi sau toate variantele lor.
Pentru a inlatura efectele nedorite si din dorinta de a va oferi in permanenta servicii
de cea mai buna calitate mesajele detectate ca fiind infectate vor fi sterse automat .
Va rugam sa luati in considerare ca exista un risc de fiecare data cand deschideti
fisiere atasate si ca MobiFon nu este responsabila pentru nici un prejudiciu cauzat de
virusi.
Disclaimer: RAV Antivirus may not be able to detect all new viruses and variants. In
order to remove unwanted effects and to continuously provide quality services all
infected e-mails will be automatically deleted .Please be aware that there is a risk
involved whenever opening e-mail attachments to your computer and that MobiFon is not
responsible for any damages caused by viruses.
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list