"Proxy" server needed - Web Access Monitor?

Scott Sharkey ssharkey at linuxunlimited.com
Wed Jun 29 12:58:58 UTC 2005


Angelo wrote:
> That's easy - Websense Enterprise does
> (http://ww2.websense.com/global/en/ProductsServices/WebsenseEnterprise/)
> what you want and more.... Now, it's not a freebee - as that wasn't
> one of you're requirements - but, it does do what you want, regards
> :o)

While I would prefer an open source product, I'm open to anything which 
will solve the problem for this client.  Thanks, I'll check it out.

-scott

> 
> On 6/28/05, Robert Williams <rwilliams at covenantdata.com> wrote:
> 
>>Usually that stuff is placed into a text file (so to speak) and then squid
>>or alternative programs parse the logs.  I know that SCO Unix server has
>>this capability.  Surprisingly, though, depending on traffic, this log file
>>can be rather large.  While in college we did a C program that could parse
>>the logs to find only symbolic domains, list the top 20, and give you quite
>>a bit of data.  As per something off the shelf or something on board Linux,
>>you've got me.  :-)  Hope this helps.
>>
>>http://www.covenantdata.com  Where data becomes information!
>>
>>
>>Robert Williams
>>Programmer / Web Developer / Network Administrator
>>Covenant Data Systems, Inc.
>>http://www.covenantdata.com
>>rwilliams at covenantdata.com
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com]
>>On Behalf Of Scott Sharkey
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:40 PM
>>To: redhat-list at redhat.com
>>Subject: "Proxy" server needed - Web Access Monitor?
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I have a need for a service or software that will monitor and track
>>outbound HTTP (web) accesses, and report what pages are being visited.
>>I know that Squid theoretically can do this, but it seems like overkill
>>for this application.  The user could care less about caching - they
>>just want to monitor what URL's their staff is visiting.
>>
>>IS squid the best option, or is there something else that would do a
>>better job?  Part of my concern is that the machine they have to run
>>this on does not have a huge amount of memory, and I understand Squid
>>can be a memory hog.
>>
>>Thanks!!!
>>
>>-Scott
>>
>>--
>>redhat-list mailing list
>>unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>>--
>>redhat-list mailing list
>>unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
> 
> 
> 




More information about the redhat-list mailing list