direct IO or cache Io on LINUX server?
martin campbell
martin.campbell at ed.ac.uk
Fri May 12 08:54:58 UTC 2006
hi, for Oracle we've found for files that have a high IO rate like temp
tablespaces & redo logs that we get a significant performace improvement
using DirectIO, so we create a directIO slice just for these types of
files.
hth
ta
martin.
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 05:09 +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> we have several DELL 6800 with LSI 4e/DC adapter cards
> (128 MB cache) in it. DELL 6800 run under Redhar AS
> 4.0 and ORACLE 9ir2. When I configured DELL 6800
> server local disks (Mirror or RAID 5), it have two
> I/O policy to choice - direct IO and cache IO.
>
> I doing simple test by copy files between differents
> disk set and found "direct IO" performance better
> than "cache IO". It is against what I read before. I
> used to saw documents from SUN and IBM said "large
> disk array cache will improve I/O performance".
>
> Any one has suggestion FOR ORACLE server which I/O
> policy should I setup?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ___________________________________________________ 最新版 Yahoo!奇摩即時通訊 7.0,免費網路電話任你打! http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/
>
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list