redhat-list Digest, Vol 52, Issue 13
Tony Kueh
akueh at cin.net
Fri Jun 13 15:58:42 UTC 2008
help
2008/6/13 <redhat-list-request at redhat.com>:
> Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
> redhat-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> redhat-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> redhat-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper at foremost.com)
> 2. Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service (Andrew Bacchi)
> 3. Failing updates (Margaret Doll)
> 4. Windows and RH (Margaret Doll)
> 5. Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper at foremost.com)
> 6. RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service (Geofrey Rainey)
> 7. Re: Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server 5 question (Pat Riehecky)
> 8. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (Pat Riehecky)
> 9. Re: Windows and RH (Pat Riehecky)
> 10. Re: Windows and RH (Margaret Doll)
> 11. Re: Windows and RH (hike)
> 12. Re: Windows and RH (Marcos Trazzini)
> 13. Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (Scott R. Ehrlich)
> 14. Re: Failing updates (Marcos Trazzini)
> 15. Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (fwd) (Scott R. Ehrlich)
> 16. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (sunhux G)
> 17. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (sunhux G)
> 18. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> (Bhat, Ajit)
> 19. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Michael Schwendt)
> 20. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Bhat, Ajit)
> 21. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Michael Schwendt)
> 22. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Bhat, Ajit)
> 23. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Bhat, Ajit)
> 24. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS (Michael Schwendt)
> 25. Re: Failing updates (Margaret Doll)
> 26. RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper at foremost.com)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: steve.stamper at foremost.com
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:55:45 -0400
> Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an
> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and
> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record)
> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the
> RH7.2 servers.
>
> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck.
> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v
> XXX at YYY.com) =
> XXX at YYY.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> XXX at YYY.com... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
>
> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully
> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas.
>
> Thanks - Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andrew Bacchi <bacchi at rpi.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:09:57 -0400
> Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> It may be firewall related. I have this line in my /etc/sysconfig/iptables file to allow localhost
>
> # Allow localhost full access.
> -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT
>
> Add it and restart the firewall. HTH.
>
> steve.stamper at foremost.com wrote:
>>
>> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an
>> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and
>> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record)
>> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the
>> RH7.2 servers.
>>
>> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck.
>> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v
>> XXX at YYY.com) =
>> XXX at YYY.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
>> XXX at YYY.com... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
>>
>> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully
>> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas.
>>
>> Thanks - Steve
>>
>>
>
> --
> veritatas simplex oratio est
> -Seneca
>
> Andrew Bacchi
> Systems Programmer
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809
>
> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll at brown.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:20:54 -0400
> Subject: Failing updates
> I have eleven systems running RedHat. Nine of them use up2date; I am having no problems with them.
>
> Two of them don't have up2date; I use "yum update" on them. These two systems are running
>
> 2.6.18-92.el5
> 2.6.18-53.el5xen (with a reboot, this system will be at the same level as the above system)
>
> I am having problems with xen-libraries
>
> more update-prob
> yum update
> Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
> rhel-i386-server-5 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package xen-libs.i386 0:3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 set to be updated
> ---> Package libhugetlbfs.i386 0:1.2-5.el5 set to be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: xen-libs = 3.0.3-41.el5_1.5 for package: xen
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: xen-libs = 3.0.3-41.el5_1.5 is needed by packag
> e xen
>
>
> and with libhugetlbfs
>
> yum update libhugetlbfs
> Loading "security" plugin
> Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
> rhel-x86_64-server-5 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00
> Skipping security plugin, no data
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> Skipping security plugin, no data
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package libhugetlbfs.x86_64 0:1.2-5.el5 set to be updated
> --> Processing Conflict: libhugetlbfs conflicts libhugetlbfs-lib < 1.2
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: libhugetlbfs conflicts with libhugetlbfs-lib < 1.2
>
> Is there a way to fix the problem?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Margaret Doll <margaret_doll at brown.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:22:50 -0400
> Subject: Windows and RH
> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on the "new" first disk.
>
> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible without re-installing RedHat?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: steve.stamper at foremost.com
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:24:26 -0400
> Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> No firewall running. I can manually send things to port 25 without an
> issue. Thanks for thinking about it....
>
>
>
>
>
> Andrew Bacchi
> <bacchi at rpi.edu> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
> Sent by: <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> redhat-list-bounces cc: (bcc: Steve Stamper/FST/Farmers/USA/Zurich)
> @redhat.com Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service
>
>
> 06/12/2008 01:09 PM
> Please respond to
> General Red Hat
> Linux discussion
> list
>
>
>
>
>
> It may be firewall related. I have this line in my
> /etc/sysconfig/iptables file to allow localhost
>
> # Allow localhost full access.
> -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT
>
> Add it and restart the firewall. HTH.
>
> steve.stamper at foremost.com wrote:
>> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an
>> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and
>> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record)
>> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the
>> RH7.2 servers.
>>
>> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck.
>> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v
>> XXX at YYY.com) =
>> XXX at YYY.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
>> XXX at YYY.com... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
>>
>> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully
>> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas.
>>
>> Thanks - Steve
>>
>>
>
> --
> veritatas simplex oratio est
> -Seneca
>
> Andrew Bacchi
> Systems Programmer
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809
>
> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Geofrey Rainey" <Geofrey.Rainey at tvnz.co.nz>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:29:34 +1200
> Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> Try editing and adding that line to the file "submit.cf", not
> "sendmail.cf".
>
> Regards,
>
> Geofrey Rainey
> Systems Engineer
> D. 64 9 916 7178
> M. 64 21 563 106
> geofrey.rainey at tvnz.co.nz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> steve.stamper at foremost.com
> Sent: Friday, 13 June 2008 4:56 a.m.
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service
>
> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an
> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and
> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record)
> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the
> RH7.2 servers.
>
> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck.
> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v
> XXX at YYY.com) =
> XXX at YYY.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> XXX at YYY.com... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
>
> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully
> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas.
>
> Thanks - Steve
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> ==========================================================
> For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us
> online at tvnz.co.nz
> ==========================================================
> CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that
> is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information
> is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck at iwu.edu>
> To: wheakory at isu.edu, General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:59:49 -0500
> Subject: Re: Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server 5 question
> I have RHEL5 running on several systems here with perfect uptime. My
> original RHEL5 box (updated through 1 and through 2) has had a recorded
> downtime of 2 hours in the last 18 months.
>
> I would heartily recommend it over RHEL4
> Pat
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:19 -0600, Kory Wheatley wrote:
>> Just a general question. Do you think that Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server
>> OS is stable to install on a production syste? Currently all our
>> systems are still using RHE 4. I have a new system that's going into
>> production and I wanted to install RHE 5 on it. Anything I need to know
>> or worry about?
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck at iwu.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:01:59 -0500
> Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected
> insert it and type dmesg that will give you an insight into what the
> system is working on. It may be as simple as having the auto media
> stuff off or it may be more complex. In either case dmesg will tell you
> what the kernel sees, from there making userspace behave is simpler.
>
> Pat
>
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:34 +0800, sunhux G wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On our RHES 4.6, when I insert a thumb drive into the USB
>> port, it will autodetect & "df -k" will show /.../usbdisk
>>
>> However, on our RHES 5.1 AP, I can't see it when I inserted
>> an external portable 2.5" hard-disk into the USB.
>>
>> I'm not sure if my colleague has hardened it - if so how do I
>> turn in on back?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> U
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck at iwu.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:04:50 -0500
> Subject: Re: Windows and RH
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote:
>> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They
>> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on
>> the "new" first disk.
>>
>> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible
>> without re-installing RedHat?
>>
>
> Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is
> going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as
> needed....
>
> Pat
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll at brown.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:58:51 -0400
> Subject: Re: Windows and RH
> Pat,
>
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They
>>> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on
>>> the "new" first disk.
>>>
>>> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible
>>> without re-installing RedHat?
>>>
>>
>> Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems
>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is
>> going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as
>> needed....
>>
>
> The instructions say to install Windows first. The problem is that the user
> installed RedHat first and then Windows.
>
>
>> Pat
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: hike <mh1272 at gmail.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:30:22 -0400
> Subject: Re: Windows and RH
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll at brown.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Pat,
>>
>> On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They
>>>> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on
>>>> the "new" first disk.
>>>>
>>>> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible
>>>> without re-installing RedHat?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems
>>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is
>>> going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as
>>> needed....
>>>
>>>
>> The instructions say to install Windows first. The problem is that the
>> user
>> installed RedHat first and then Windows.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pat
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-list mailing list
>>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>>
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>
>
> This is not a big problem.
> There are instructions on the web (I have seen them. google "windows linux
> dual boot", etc.). You can boot Linux from the Windows boot loader and you
> can boot Windows from Grub. (You can even use Grub to boot just
> Windows--that is, no Linux partition at all but that isn't your situation.)
>
> Grub and the Windows boot-loader both reside in the MBR (master boot record)
> so either will do.
>
> You can even load Grub over the Windows boot-loader after the fact. It just
> it is easier to load Windows first and then load Linux.
>
>
> Another topic, have you taken the time to berate and belittle your end
> user.
> All work and no play makes an admin a dull admin.
> The BOFH has plenty of suggestions, too!
> LOL!
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Marcos Trazzini" <mstrazzini at gmail.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:48:08 -0300
> Subject: Re: Windows and RH
> I guess that if you change the boot disk to the second disk (Red Hat
> Linux) and put the following grub boot entry (on /boot/grub/menu.lst)
> should fix the problem:
>
> ---- CUT HERE ----
>
> title Windows
> root (hd0,0)
> savedefault
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
>
> ---- CUT HERE ----
>
> Rgds
>
> --
> Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Scott R. Ehrlich" <scott at MIT.EDU>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5?
> Hello to all:
>
> I am very interested in FW Depot's - http://fwdepot.com) eRAID 5 system for a relatively inexpensive (vs 4k or more) external, self-contained RAID 5 system as a hard drive backup solution.
>
> I am first wondering people's thoughts/experiences with this company?
> How are they with support and customer feedback? What is the quality of their products? How well do their products, or, in this case, their eRAID 5, interface with a CentOS 5 machine?
>
> I sent them a question via their web interface yesterday, then when I got no response today, I emailed them this morning, and still no response.
> Doesn't make me feel very optimistic of their [potential] customer interaction. No phone number on their Contact Us sight doesn't help either.
>
> Are there any other similar RAID 5 devices from other places that have good customer feedback and whose products are well-liked and work well?
>
> Thanks for any insight/feedback.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Marcos Trazzini" <mstrazzini at gmail.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:44:21 -0300
> Subject: Re: Failing updates
> Humm.. Have you (or someone) checked the "Virtualization" box on the
> software profile selection during the installation of these RHEL5
> servers?
>
> Anyway, the server must be subscribed to "RHEL Virtualization" software channel.
>
> --
> Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Scott R. Ehrlich" <scott at MIT.EDU>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (fwd)
> Let's modify the request to also include reputable companies offering a
> similar type of device with a starting price of $3000.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Scott
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Scott R. Ehrlich <scott at mit.edu>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5?
>
> Hello to all:
>
> I am very interested in FW Depot's - http://fwdepot.com) eRAID 5 system for a relatively inexpensive (vs 4k or more) external, self-contained RAID 5 system as a hard drive backup solution.
>
> I am first wondering people's thoughts/experiences with this company?
> How are they with support and customer feedback? What is the quality of their products? How well do their products, or, in this case, their eRAID 5, interface with a CentOS 5 machine?
>
> I sent them a question via their web interface yesterday, then when I got no response today, I emailed them this morning, and still no response.
> Doesn't make me feel very optimistic of their [potential] customer interaction. No phone number on their Contact Us sight doesn't help either.
>
> Are there any other similar RAID 5 devices from other places that have good customer feedback and whose products are well-liked and work well?
>
> Thanks for any insight/feedback.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "sunhux G" <sunhux at gmail.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:47:49 +0800
> Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected
> Hi,
>
> "dmesg" has this :
>
> usb 5-8: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and addr 7
> usb 5-8: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> scsi6 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass storage devices
> Vendor: WDC WD25 Model ...
> Type: Direct-Access
> SCSI device sdj: ... 250059MB (Yes, this USB disk is 250Gb)
> sdj: Write protect is off
> sdj: sdjl
>
> Time stamp of
> /dev/sdj &
> /dev/usb5.7_ep00 _ep01 _ep82
> showed these device files have just been created
>
> Tried :
> mount -t usbfs /dev/sdj /mnt
> but saw a few weird files in /mnt & not the files I'm
> expecting to see.
>
> "-t msdos", "-t autofs", "-t hfs" won't mount.
> So what should I do next as "df -k" still not showing
> usb partitions mounted.
>
>
> On 6/13/08, Pat Riehecky <prieheck at iwu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> insert it and type dmesg that will give you an insight into what the
>> system is working on. It may be as simple as having the auto media
>> stuff off or it may be more complex. In either case dmesg will tell you
>> what the kernel sees, from there making userspace behave is simpler.
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:34 +0800, sunhux G wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On our RHES 4.6, when I insert a thumb drive into the USB
>> > port, it will autodetect & "df -k" will show /.../usbdisk
>> >
>> > However, on our RHES 5.1 AP, I can't see it when I inserted
>> > an external portable 2.5" hard-disk into the USB.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure if my colleague has hardened it - if so how do I
>> > turn in on back?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > U
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "sunhux G" <sunhux at gmail.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:56:22 +0800
> Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected
> Hi,
>
> Just to add a little info on what I've seen in /var/log/messages
> when a thumb drive is inserted :
>
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: SCSI device sdj: 999424 512 byte (512Mb) -
> yes, my thumb
> drive is 512Mb
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: sdj: write protect is off
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: assuming drive cache write through
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: sdj: sdl
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: attached SCSI removable disk sdj
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: attached SCSI sg13 type 0
>
> <<< now I pull out the thumb drive & next message appeared in messages >>>
> June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: usb 5-8: USB disconnected, address 10
>
>
> When I did "mount -t usbfs /dev/sdj /usb",
> found under /usb, following files/folders though
> my thumb drive is supposed to contain other files :
> 001
> 002
> ...
> 005
> devices
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat at Informatica.com>
> To: <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100
> Subject: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> Hi -
>
> We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs
> successfully on Linux 4 ES
>
> The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is -
> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev)
>
> Following link discusses work around
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/
>
> wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by
> upgrading glibc?
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> - Ajit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:04:24 +0200
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs
>> successfully on Linux 4 ES
>>
>> The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is -
>> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev)
>>
>> Following link discusses work around
>> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/
>>
>> wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by
>> upgrading glibc?
>
> It is much more likely a bug in the application.
> Show the stacktrace.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat at Informatica.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100
> Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?
>
> Stack trace is -
>
> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()
>
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release-note
> s/as-x86/
>
>
> - Ajit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: 13 June 2008 12:04
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs
>> successfully on Linux 4 ES
>>
>> The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is -
>> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev)
>>
>> Following link discusses work around
>> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/
>>
>> wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by
>> upgrading glibc?
>
> It is much more likely a bug in the application.
> Show the stacktrace.
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:22:13 +0200
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?
>
> Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack
> usage, other run-time side-effects.
>
> Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations?
>
> Same version of glibc? If not, why not?
>
> And in either case, which version of glibc is it?
>
>> Stack trace is -
>>
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
>> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()
>
> Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat at Informatica.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:29:00 +0100
> Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> Thanks -
>
> Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc
> version
>
> rpm -q -a | grep glibc
>
> On failing machine -
>
> glibc-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98.EL
> glibc-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
> glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-common-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30
> glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
>
> On passing machine -
>
> glibc-2.3.4-2
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2
> glibc-2.3.4-2
> glibc-headers-2.3.4-2
> glibc-common-2.3.4-2
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2
>
>
> I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference?
> Also, that's the only stack trace we get which is not much informative.
>
> - Ajit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: 13 June 2008 12:22
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?
>
> Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack
> usage, other run-time side-effects.
>
> Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations?
>
> Same version of glibc? If not, why not?
>
> And in either case, which version of glibc is it?
>
>> Stack trace is -
>>
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
>> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from
> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()
>
> Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to?
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat at Informatica.com>
> To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:32:35 +0100
> Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> Hi -
>
> We always build our product on passing machine which is Linux 4 ES and
> same code now testing on Linux 4 AS. Glibc and gcc version are different
> on failing machine.
>
> - Ajit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bhat, Ajit
> Sent: 13 June 2008 12:29
> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'
> Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS
>
> Thanks -
>
> Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc
> version
>
> rpm -q -a | grep glibc
>
> On failing machine -
>
> glibc-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98.EL
> glibc-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
> glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-common-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30
> glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.25
> glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.25
> compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30
>
> On passing machine -
>
> glibc-2.3.4-2
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2
> glibc-2.3.4-2
> glibc-headers-2.3.4-2
> glibc-common-2.3.4-2
> glibc-devel-2.3.4-2
>
>
> I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference?
> Also, that's the only stack trace we get which is not much informative.
>
> - Ajit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
> Sent: 13 June 2008 12:22
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4
> AS
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?
>
> Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack
> usage, other run-time side-effects.
>
> Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations?
>
> Same version of glibc? If not, why not?
>
> And in either case, which version of glibc is it?
>
>> Stack trace is -
>>
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
>> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from
> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
>> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()
>
> Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to?
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:47:29 +0200
> Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:29:00 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:
>
>> Thanks -
>>
>> Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc
>> version
>>
>> rpm -q -a | grep glibc
>>
>> On failing machine -
>>
>> glibc-2.3.4-2.25
>
> Not up-to-date either.
>
>> On passing machine -
>>
>> glibc-2.3.4-2
>
> This machine has not seen any update yet. This original glibc is more
> than three years old. There have been several updates since then.
>
>> I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference?
>
> Be sure to give the latest glibc update a try. It could be that it
> includes fixes you need.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll at brown.edu>
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:01:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: Failing updates
>
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Marcos Trazzini wrote:
>
>> Humm.. Have you (or someone) checked the "Virtualization" box on the
>> software profile selection during the installation of these RHEL5
>> servers?
>>
>> Anyway, the server must be subscribed to "RHEL Virtualization" software channel.
>
> I installed one of the system; a user installed the other.
>
> I don't remember anything about an RHEL Virtualization software channel as I was
> doing the installation.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini at gmail.com
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: steve.stamper at foremost.com
> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:47:10 -0400
> Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> Hurray!! Issued Resolved!!! Geofrey - your my hero!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Geofrey Rainey"
> <Geofrey.Rainey at tvn To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list"
> z.co.nz> <redhat-list at redhat.com>
> Sent by: cc: (bcc: Steve Stamper/FST/Farmers/USA/Zurich)
> redhat-list-bounces Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service
> @redhat.com
>
>
> 06/12/2008 01:29 PM
> Please respond to
> General Red Hat
> Linux discussion
> list
>
>
>
>
>
> Try editing and adding that line to the file "submit.cf", not
> "sendmail.cf".
>
> Regards,
>
> Geofrey Rainey
> Systems Engineer
> D. 64 9 916 7178
> M. 64 21 563 106
> geofrey.rainey at tvnz.co.nz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> steve.stamper at foremost.com
> Sent: Friday, 13 June 2008 4:56 a.m.
> To: redhat-list at redhat.com
> Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service
>
> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an
> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and
> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record)
> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the
> RH7.2 servers.
>
> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck.
> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v
> XXX at YYY.com) =
> XXX at YYY.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
> XXX at YYY.com... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
>
> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully
> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas.
>
> Thanks - Steve
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> ==========================================================
> For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us
> online at tvnz.co.nz
> ==========================================================
> CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that
> is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information
> is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation.
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> redhat-list mailing list
> Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list