[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS



On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote:

> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES?

Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack
usage, other run-time side-effects.

Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations?

Same version of glibc? If not, why not?

And in either case, which version of glibc is it?
 
> Stack trace is -
> 
> #0  0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) where
> #0  0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #1  0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #2  0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #3  0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from
> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #4  0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #5  0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #6  0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #7  0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #8  0x0000000000584a8a in _start ()

Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]