Weird ethernet port behavior

[Matty Sarro]

Trying it now, problem is it has to be automated so I have to start from
scratch. Will report back afterwards. Going to try specifying them in the
ifcfg files, and if that doesn't work I'll try adding udev rules.

Blah, this script is getting incredibly and annoyingly complex, lol.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:56 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:

> Matty Sarro wrote:
> > Hey everyone. I'm having a weird issue right now with a network port and
> I
> > don't know what to make of it.
> <snip>
> > Eth1 is configured to connect to a secondary network. Eth3 is disabled
> > (onboot=no in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth3).
> >
> > Here are the contents of the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth3 files:
> > eth1
> > DEVICE=eth1
> > BOOTPROTO=static
> > ONBOOT=yes
> > NETWORK=10.253.163.224
> > NETMASK=255.255.255.224
> > IPADDR=10.253.163.242
> > USERCTL=no
> >
> > eth3
> > DEVICE=eth3
> > USERCTL=no
> > ONBOOT=no
> > BOOTPROTO=dhcp
> >
> > After the bonded pair, we have two ethernet ports left. When we attempt
> to
> > plug in what SHOULD be eth1 and restart network services, it gets no
> > connectivity. After rebooting, when you run ethtool eth1 it shows that
> > eth1 has no link. Running ethtool on eth3 shows that it DOES have link.
> <snip>
> Sounds like it's related to the old Redhat thing that a multihomed system
> didn't necessarily get the same name, unless you put the MAC address in
> there.
> HWADDR=<MAC address>
>
> You might try that and see if it works.
>
>        mark
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>