[redhat-lspp] License for dev_allocator?

[Daniel J Walsh]

Chad Hanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry this took so long.... I have attached an updated source RPM with some
> improved content and a GPL license.
>
> -Chad 
>
>   
First pass at clean up of spec file.

Why are you creating a separate rpm for libs?  I think they should be in 
the default package.
Need to remove the debug line to get it to build here.

I am not crazy about the namespace problems on libfloppy and libcdrom.  
I see a good chance at collision there.

Dan
>> I have a patch for the dev_allocator sources TCS posted to this list a 
>> while back which makes the library/tool a little more useful and fixes a 
>> few problems.  However, before I can post the patch I need some 
>> indication from TCS that the dev_allocator sources they posted are now 
>> under an OpenSource license.  For various reasons I think a lot of 
>> people on this list would like to see the code open.
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> redhat-lspp mailing list
>> redhat-lspp at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lspp


-- 


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diff
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/redhat-lspp/attachments/20051017/fb07fe1f/attachment.ksh>