[redhat-lspp] LSPP/RBACPP requirements v.002

[Stephen Smalley]

On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 13:44 -0400, Chad Hanson wrote:
> We do have our own MITRE translation library. I would think we should either
> extend the current libsetrans to support a generic MLS translator based on
> whether the config is MCS or MLS or just create a new libsetrans. I don;t
> know which is the best approach here.

I think generalizing the existing libsetrans in Fedora would be
preferable.  One less difference between the lspp-evaluated system and a
default system, and testing of the common code paths by the entire
community.

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency