[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [redhat-lspp] mls level to without classification



On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, George C. Wilson wrote:

> Is it acceptable to make use of the old controls for the certified
> configuration?  Or must we migrate to secmark?  We want to avoid having to
> document and test secmark so that we don't increase the scope of the TOE.

I don't know what's desirable for certification.  The old controls will 
exist for the life of RHEL5, in any case.



-- 
James Morris
<jmorris redhat com>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]