[redhat-lspp] mls level to without classification

[Joe Nall]

On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:43 AM, George C. Wilson wrote:

> Is it acceptable to make use of the old controls for the certified
> configuration?  Or must we migrate to secmark?  We want to avoid  
> having to
> document and test secmark so that we don't increase the scope of  
> the TOE.

Two questions:
  1) Without secmark, is it possible to label an IP address?
  2) If secmark is present and enabled in RH5, how do you
     remove it from the TOE? By administrative fiat or real
     code change?

joe