[redhat-lspp] LSPP requirements

[Klaus Weidner]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:14:03AM -0600, Klaus Weidner wrote:
> [...] so it would be inappropriate to say that "SELinux" meets the
> requirements. You need to consider the developer (Red Hat) and the
> sponsor (who usually provides additional testing and documents) also.

I didn't mean to imply that Red Hat was solely developing the software,
it's of course a community effort. It was intended as an example of what
the CC process considers to be the developer in such an evaluation, since
the CC are not designed to evaluate open source as such.

-Klaus