redhat-sysadmin-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6
stevie kabs
steviekabslov at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 12:59:19 UTC 2009
Hi
have you tries solaris wind! it should work for you.
Keep in a loop if it works
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:39 AM, <redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com> wrote:
> Send redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list submissions to
> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> redhat-sysadmin-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of redhat-sysadmin-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Systerm Monitoring (madunix)
> 2. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Patrick Lambooy)
> 3. Uptime showing wrong info (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
> 4. RE: Uptime showing wrong info (ravi channavajhala)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:16:29 +0300
> From: madunix <madunix at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <4d3f56c90908051116o1fbd0b6bha0d1a283d2ac39fd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> i use cacti and nagios.
>
> -mu
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ramesh Basukala<basukalaramesh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You may also look at zenoss.
>> URL: http://www.zenoss.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 AM, <redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Send redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list submissions to
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list-owner at redhat.com
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of redhat-sysadmin-list digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>> 2. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Andoni -)
>>> 3. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Trevor Hemsley)
>>> 4. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Jonathan Billings)
>>> 5. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Lincoln Fessenden)
>>> 6. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>> 7. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Matt Joyce)
>>> 8. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>> 9. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Jeffrey G Thomas)
>>> 10. Re: Systerm Monitoring (GaryCarr)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:10:03 +0530
>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E4048854012F5507 at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> HI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>>
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Joseph
>>> Chen
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than 100
>>> servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises nagios is
>>> highly recommended.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard
>>> <dwight.hubbard at efausol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nagios
>>>
>>> Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>> functional.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello All
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>> implement.
>>>
>>> Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I
>>> am taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>>
>>> Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>>
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dwight Hubbard
>>> Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>> Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>> Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>> Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com
>>> Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>> Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>> VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/9b13051c/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:08:33 +0200
>>> From: Andoni - <andoni at tierradeayala.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <3cc5d0920908042308i5ecb9b13t42ea139dcf5e383 at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I have about 4.000 servers and use:
>>>
>>> http://www.xymon.com/
>>> http://www.cacti.net/
>>> http://www.nagios.org/
>>>
>>> Bye
>>> Andoni
>>>
>>> 2009/8/5 <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>>
>>> > HI
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers…
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> >
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > *From:* redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Joseph Chen
>>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>> > *To:* redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > *Subject:* Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than 100
>>> > servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises nagios is
>>> > highly recommended.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard <
>>> > dwight.hubbard at efausol.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Nagios
>>> >
>>> > Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>> > functional.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello All
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>> > implement.
>>> >
>>> > Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I am
>>> > taking
>>> > info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>> >
>>> > Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> >
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Dwight Hubbard
>>> > Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>> > Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>> > Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>> > Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com
>>> > Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>> > Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>> > VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/922e1392/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:58:29 +0100
>>> From: Trevor Hemsley <trevor.hemsley at codefarm.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID: <4A7949B5.6000800 at codefarm.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>
>>> I removed Zabbix from our environment because it was too resource
>>> intensive (it wanted to use about 50% cpu on a quad core 2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
>>> machine) just to monitor a few dozen servers. Maybe I could have done
>>> some investigation of why it was like this but the product was installed
>>> by a colleague who'd spent about 4 months getting it to this point.
>>>
>>> I replaced it with Nagios in about 2 days and that barely registers on
>>> any measuring tools :)
>>>
>>> nitin.gizare at wipro.com wrote:
>>> >
>>> > HI
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers…
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> >
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > *From:* redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>> > [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Joseph
>>> > Chen
>>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>> > *To:* redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > *Subject:* Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>> > 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>> > nagios is highly recommended.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard
>>> > <dwight.hubbard at efausol.com <mailto:dwight.hubbard at efausol.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Nagios
>>> >
>>> > Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>> > functional.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com
>>> > <mailto:nitin.gizare at wipro.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello All
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>> > implement.
>>> >
>>> > Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I am
>>> > taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>> >
>>> > Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> >
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Dwight Hubbard
>>> > Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>> > Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>> > Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>> > Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com <mailto:dwight at dwighthubbard.com>
>>> > Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>> > Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>> > VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com <mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Trevor Hemsley
>>> Infrastructure Engineer
>>> .................................................
>>> * C A L Y P S O
>>> * Brighton, UK
>>>
>>> OFFICE +44 (0) 1273 666 350
>>> FAX +44 (0) 1273 666 351
>>>
>>> .................................................
>>> www.calypso.com
>>>
>>> This electronic-mail might contain confidential information intended
>>> only for the use by the entity named. If the reader of this message is
>>> not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any
>>> dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.
>>>
>>> * P * /*/ Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail /*/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:28:56 -0400
>>> From: Jonathan Billings <jsbillin at umich.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID: <20090805112856.GB93034 at netra.local>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:58:29AM +0100, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>>> > I removed Zabbix from our environment because it was too resource
>>> > intensive (it wanted to use about 50% cpu on a quad core 2.4GHz, 8GB RAM
>>> > machine) just to monitor a few dozen servers. Maybe I could have done
>>> > some investigation of why it was like this but the product was installed
>>> > by a colleague who'd spent about 4 months getting it to this point.
>>>
>>> One of the reasons I moved away from zabbix is that it opens up a
>>> connection to the monitored host's zabbix agent for every single item
>>> that it is monitoring -- and the default template for linux includes
>>> about a hundred items, so every time it checks a host it makes at
>>> least 100 connections to the same host.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Billings <jonathan.billings at umich.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 5
>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:30:33 -0400
>>> From: Lincoln Fessenden <lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID: <4A796D59.2070602 at jefferson.edu>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>
>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>> > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>> > 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>> > nagios is highly recommended.
>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 6
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:31:33 +0530
>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E4048854013665BA at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> HI
>>>
>>> What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the Monitoring
>>> Server?
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Lincoln
>>> Fessenden
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>
>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>> > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>> > 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>> > nagios is highly recommended.
>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 7
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:31:51 +1000
>>> From: Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <5d6e2cd0908050531w36fd2aedjbcb15e8631c367de at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Have been using Nagios for year. Rock solid.Not just reliable, but can be
>>> as simple or as complex as you need it to be.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > HI
>>> >
>>> > What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the Monitoring
>>> > Server?
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>> > [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Lincoln
>>> > Fessenden
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>> > To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> >
>>> > Joseph Chen wrote:
>>> > > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>> > > 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>> > > nagios is highly recommended.
>>> > Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Lincoln Fessenden
>>> > Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> >
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/7686251e/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 8
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:03:51 +0530
>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E404885401366600 at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> HI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>>
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Matt Joyce
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 6:02 PM
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Have been using Nagios for year. Rock solid.
>>>
>>> Not just reliable, but can be as simple or as complex as you need it to
>>> be.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> HI
>>>
>>> What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the Monitoring
>>> Server?
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>> Nitin
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>
>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Lincoln
>>> Fessenden
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>
>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>> > Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>> > 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>> > nagios is highly recommended.
>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/24230e1f/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 9
>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:01:57 -0500
>>> From: Jeffrey G Thomas <Jeffrey.Thomas at sierra-bravo.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID: <200908050902.05986.Jeffrey.Thomas at sierra-bravo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> > I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>> > implement.
>>>
>>> I am not sure about the ease-to-implement for any of these, but there were
>>> two recent discussions on Slashdot.org which may interest you:
>>> http://slashdot.org/story/09/07/08/210241/slashdot.sourceforge.net
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/21/218206/Best-Tools-For-Network-Inventory-Management
>>>
>>> Jeffrey
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>> Name: not available
>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
>>> Size: 197 bytes
>>> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
>>> Url :
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/2837c919/attachment.bin
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 10
>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:00:36 -0600
>>> From: GaryCarr <gcarr at lanl.gov>
>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> Message-ID: <4A799E94.2020708 at lanl.gov>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Try "ksysguard". Lets you look at a lot of system parameters. Can
>>> monitor remote systems through ssh.
>>>
>>> nitin.gizare at wipro.com wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello All
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>> > implement.
>>> >
>>> > Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I am
>>> > taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>> >
>>> > Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rgds
>>> >
>>> > Nitin
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> > redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/3a6850eb/attachment.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>> End of redhat-sysadmin-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4
>>> ***************************************************
>>
>>
>> --
>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:51:44 +0200
> From: Patrick Lambooy <p.lambooy at narmida.com>
> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <23D06F54-27B5-4978-B471-AF7887EC6CCD at narmida.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed;
> delsp=yes
>
> Nagios 1200+ servers and counting up :-)
> look at groundwork has also nagios in it
> and cati and makes it easy
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 8:16 PM, madunix wrote:
>
>> i use cacti and nagios.
>>
>> -mu
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ramesh Basukala<basukalaramesh at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> You may also look at zenoss.
>>> URL: http://www.zenoss.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 AM, <redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Send redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list submissions to
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list-request at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list-owner at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>> than "Re: Contents of redhat-sysadmin-list digest..."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>
>>>> 1. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>>> 2. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Andoni -)
>>>> 3. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Trevor Hemsley)
>>>> 4. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Jonathan Billings)
>>>> 5. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Lincoln Fessenden)
>>>> 6. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>>> 7. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Matt Joyce)
>>>> 8. RE: Systerm Monitoring (nitin.gizare at wipro.com)
>>>> 9. Re: Systerm Monitoring (Jeffrey G Thomas)
>>>> 10. Re: Systerm Monitoring (GaryCarr)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 1
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:10:03 +0530
>>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E4048854012F5507 at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com
>>>> >
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>
>>>> HI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>>
>>>> Nitin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Joseph
>>>> Chen
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more
>>>> than 100
>>>> servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>> nagios is
>>>> highly recommended.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard
>>>> <dwight.hubbard at efausol.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Nagios
>>>>
>>>> Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>>> functional.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy
>>>> to
>>>> implement.
>>>>
>>>> Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of
>>>> now I
>>>> am taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>>
>>>> Nitin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dwight Hubbard
>>>> Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>>> Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>>> Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>>> Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com
>>>> Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>>> Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>>> VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/9b13051c/attachment.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 2
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:08:33 +0200
>>>> From: Andoni - <andoni at tierradeayala.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <3cc5d0920908042308i5ecb9b13t42ea139dcf5e383 at mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I have about 4.000 servers and use:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.xymon.com/
>>>> http://www.cacti.net/
>>>> http://www.nagios.org/
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>> Andoni
>>>>
>>>> 2009/8/5 <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>>>
>>>>> HI
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Joseph Chen
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>>>> *To:* redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more
>>>>> than 100
>>>>> servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>> nagios is
>>>>> highly recommended.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard <
>>>>> dwight.hubbard at efausol.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nagios
>>>>>
>>>>> Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>>>> functional.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>>>> implement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I am
>>>>> taking
>>>>> info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dwight Hubbard
>>>>> Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>>>> Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>>>> Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>>>> Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com
>>>>> Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>>>> Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>>>> VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/922e1392/attachment.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 3
>>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:58:29 +0100
>>>> From: Trevor Hemsley <trevor.hemsley at codefarm.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID: <4A7949B5.6000800 at codefarm.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>>
>>>> I removed Zabbix from our environment because it was too resource
>>>> intensive (it wanted to use about 50% cpu on a quad core 2.4GHz,
>>>> 8GB RAM
>>>> machine) just to monitor a few dozen servers. Maybe I could have
>>>> done
>>>> some investigation of why it was like this but the product was
>>>> installed
>>>> by a colleague who'd spent about 4 months getting it to this point.
>>>>
>>>> I replaced it with Nagios in about 2 days and that barely
>>>> registers on
>>>> any measuring tools :)
>>>>
>>>> nitin.gizare at wipro.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> HI
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok thanks ,we have about 125 Servers…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of
>>>>> *Joseph
>>>>> Chen
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:08 AM
>>>>> *To:* redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>>>> 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>> nagios is highly recommended.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dwight Hubbard
>>>>> <dwight.hubbard at efausol.com <mailto:dwight.hubbard at efausol.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nagios
>>>>>
>>>>> Some other stuff looks prettier but I haven't found anything as
>>>>> functional.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com
>>>>> <mailto:nitin.gizare at wipro.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>>>> implement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now
>>>>> I am
>>>>> taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> <mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dwight Hubbard
>>>>> Owner Effective Automation Solutions
>>>>> Website: http://effectiveautomationsolutions.com
>>>>> Blog: http://computing.dwighthubbard.info
>>>>> Email: dwight at dwighthubbard.com <mailto:dwight at dwighthubbard.com>
>>>>> Phone: (503) 941-0327
>>>>> Redhat Certified Engineer - RHCE #804007137224095
>>>>> VMware Certified Professional - VCP #18529
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com <mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sponser and operater: Linux monitoring solution: http://admon.org
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Trevor Hemsley
>>>> Infrastructure Engineer
>>>> .................................................
>>>> * C A L Y P S O
>>>> * Brighton, UK
>>>>
>>>> OFFICE +44 (0) 1273 666 350
>>>> FAX +44 (0) 1273 666 351
>>>>
>>>> .................................................
>>>> www.calypso.com
>>>>
>>>> This electronic-mail might contain confidential information intended
>>>> only for the use by the entity named. If the reader of this
>>>> message is
>>>> not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any
>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.
>>>>
>>>> * P * /*/ Please consider the environment before printing this e-
>>>> mail /*/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 4
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:28:56 -0400
>>>> From: Jonathan Billings <jsbillin at umich.edu>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID: <20090805112856.GB93034 at netra.local>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:58:29AM +0100, Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>>>>> I removed Zabbix from our environment because it was too resource
>>>>> intensive (it wanted to use about 50% cpu on a quad core 2.4GHz,
>>>>> 8GB RAM
>>>>> machine) just to monitor a few dozen servers. Maybe I could have
>>>>> done
>>>>> some investigation of why it was like this but the product was
>>>>> installed
>>>>> by a colleague who'd spent about 4 months getting it to this point.
>>>>
>>>> One of the reasons I moved away from zabbix is that it opens up a
>>>> connection to the monitored host's zabbix agent for every single
>>>> item
>>>> that it is monitoring -- and the default template for linux includes
>>>> about a hundred items, so every time it checks a host it makes at
>>>> least 100 connections to the same host.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jonathan Billings <jonathan.billings at umich.edu>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 5
>>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:30:33 -0400
>>>> From: Lincoln Fessenden <lincoln.fessenden at jefferson.edu>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID: <4A796D59.2070602 at jefferson.edu>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>>
>>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>>>> 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>> nagios is highly recommended.
>>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 6
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:31:33 +0530
>>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E4048854013665BA at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com
>>>> >
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>
>>>> HI
>>>>
>>>> What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the
>>>> Monitoring
>>>> Server?
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>> Nitin
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>>>> Lincoln
>>>> Fessenden
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>
>>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>>>> 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>> nagios is highly recommended.
>>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 7
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:31:51 +1000
>>>> From: Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <5d6e2cd0908050531w36fd2aedjbcb15e8631c367de at mail.gmail.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>
>>>> Have been using Nagios for year. Rock solid.Not just reliable,
>>>> but can be
>>>> as simple or as complex as you need it to be.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HI
>>>>>
>>>>> What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the
>>>>> Monitoring
>>>>> Server?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Lincoln
>>>>> Fessenden
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>>
>>>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more
>>>>>> than
>>>>>> 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>>> nagios is highly recommended.
>>>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/7686251e/attachment.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 8
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:03:51 +0530
>>>> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
>>>> Subject: RE: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E404885401366600 at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com
>>>> >
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>
>>>> HI
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>>
>>>> Nitin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Matt
>>>> Joyce
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 6:02 PM
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have been using Nagios for year. Rock solid.
>>>>
>>>> Not just reliable, but can be as simple or as complex as you need
>>>> it to
>>>> be.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:01 PM, <nitin.gizare at wipro.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI
>>>>
>>>> What is right kind of configuration I should choose for the
>>>> Monitoring
>>>> Server?
>>>>
>>>> Rgds
>>>> Nitin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
>>>>
>>>> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
>>>> Lincoln
>>>> Fessenden
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:01 PM
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>>
>>>> Joseph Chen wrote:
>>>>> Basically it depends on your servers' amount. If you have more than
>>>>> 100 servers, I think zabbix should be a better choice, otherwises
>>>>> nagios is highly recommended.
>>>> Using Nagios on hundreds of servers here with no problems.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lincoln Fessenden
>>>> Jeff-IT Linux Systems Administrator
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/24230e1f/attachment.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 9
>>>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:01:57 -0500
>>>> From: Jeffrey G Thomas <Jeffrey.Thomas at sierra-bravo.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID: <200908050902.05986.Jeffrey.Thomas at sierra-bravo.com>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>>>> implement.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about the ease-to-implement for any of these, but
>>>> there were
>>>> two recent discussions on Slashdot.org which may interest you:
>>>> http://slashdot.org/story/09/07/08/210241/slashdot.sourceforge.net
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/07/21/218206/Best-Tools-For-Network-Inventory-Management
>>>>
>>>> Jeffrey
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> Name: not available
>>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
>>>> Size: 197 bytes
>>>> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
>>>> Url :
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/2837c919/attachment.bin
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Message: 10
>>>> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:00:36 -0600
>>>> From: GaryCarr <gcarr at lanl.gov>
>>>> Subject: Re: Systerm Monitoring
>>>> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> Message-ID: <4A799E94.2020708 at lanl.gov>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>>
>>>> Try "ksysguard". Lets you look at a lot of system parameters. Can
>>>> monitor remote systems through ssh.
>>>>
>>>> nitin.gizare at wipro.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am looking for some good system monitoring which are easy to
>>>>> implement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also let me know how make sure system is healthy?, as of now I am
>>>>> taking info from uptime/top and checking for load.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know u expert suggestions,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rgds
>>>>>
>>>>> Nitin
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>> URL:
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090805/3a6850eb/attachment.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>>
>>>> End of redhat-sysadmin-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 4
>>>> ***************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>>
>>
>> --
>> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
>> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:44:22 +0530
> From: <nitin.gizare at wipro.com>
> Subject: Uptime showing wrong info
> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <BE18D985136C9B48AB6DDE02E40488540136682A at BLR-EC-MBX06.wipro.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> We have server with RHEL 3.0 Up6 and up for 496 days.
>
> Till 22 July 09 it was showing 496 days up in uptime command But on 23
> July 09 uptime is showing is 1 days up.
>
> We have not rebooted the Server.
>
>
>
> Any ideas why uptime is showing 1 days instead showing 497 days up?
>
>
>
> Please help me to understand this....
>
>
>
> Rgds
>
> Nitin
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090806/a7185019/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:08:50 +0530
> From: "ravi channavajhala" <ravi.channavajhala at dciera.com>
> Subject: RE: Uptime showing wrong info
> To: <redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <4a7a6c6d.1420720a.522a.fffff1f6 at mx.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> No surprise there, the uptime wraps around every 497 days. What in the
> world are you doing with RHEL 3.0 anyway, this is on kernel 2.4 and the
> problem of jiffies wrapping around is well known.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> C. Ravi Kumar
>
> CTO
>
>
>
> http://www.dciera.com <http://www.dciera.com/>
>
> Follow me on twitter http://www.twitter.com/DCiEra
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:redhat-sysadmin-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> nitin.gizare at wipro.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:44 AM
> To: redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Uptime showing wrong info
>
>
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> We have server with RHEL 3.0 Up6 and up for 496 days.
>
> Till 22 July 09 it was showing 496 days up in uptime command But on 23 July
> 09 uptime is showing is 1 days up.
>
> We have not rebooted the Server.
>
>
>
> Any ideas why uptime is showing 1 days instead showing 497 days up?
>
>
>
> Please help me to understand this....
>
>
>
> Rgds
>
> Nitin
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090806/f90b06c2/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
>
> End of redhat-sysadmin-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6
> ***************************************************
>
--
Stephen Kabali
Makerere University
Computer Science
+256 782-706582
More information about the redhat-sysadmin-list
mailing list