sendmail.cf -vs- sendmail.mc

[Joe Kazura]

I assumed that there would enough of a difference in the versions of  
sendmail as well as locations of files/libraries, etc. to cause  
problems.

Also, because I planned to edit/add SSL support that didn't exist on  
the old server.

More info:  old box is a Pentium II (i386), new is a quad core Xeon  
(x86_64) - so 64 bit & SMP lib changes.

   Joe Kazura


On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Ben Kevan wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:07:35 -0800, Joe Kazura <joe.kazura at unh.edu>  
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been asked to help out one of our overloaded sysadmins ...
>>
>> I'm not quite 'green', but not quite 'seasoned' - to use a firewood
>> metaphor.
>>
>> I'm migrating an ANCIENT Red Hat 7.3 box to a brand new Dell blade
>> server w/RHEL 5.
>>
>> On the old server, sendmail.cf was hand coded and there are no
>> sendmail.mc files at all.
>>
>> Is there such a tool that will reverse engineer the .cf to a .mc ?
>>
>> I'd rather NOT have to learn native sendmail!
>>
>> Sorry if this isn't a proper question for this list, please direct me
>> elsewhere as appropriate.
>>
>
> Why not just use sendmail.cf?
> -- 
> I say never be complete. I say stop being perfect. I say let's  
> evolve. Let the chips fall where they may.  -Fight Club
>
>
> --
> redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list
> redhat-sysadmin-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2364 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/redhat-sysadmin-list/attachments/20090219/fe8933aa/attachment.p7s>