[rhelv6-beta-list] rhel6 remote installs not working

solarflow99 solarflow99 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 12 00:00:38 UTC 2010


I noticed from my experiences with other vendors, they all do that.
It pays to have a support plan.



On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Kaj Niemi <kajtzu at a51.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Does this mean we're back to square one like we were on RHEL4 and
> particularly Dell/HP hardware with eth0/eth1 being swapped until 4U5? [1] Is
> it just me or does anyone else find it unacceptable that ports get that kind
> of treatment? ;)
>
>
> [1] http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v2.pdf
>
>
>
> Kaj
>
> On 11/8/2010 05:22, "Jon Masters" <jcm at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If you mean to refer to the ordering difference with respect to RHEL5,
>> this is a result of two important changes:
>>
>> 1). Kudzu has officially gone out to pasture.
>> 2). Upstream introduced parallel udev but didn't solve the problems
>> associated with doing that (boot time improvements are great on the
>> desktop, but on the server we care a little more about consequence).
>>
>> The first issue means that, although enumeration is consistent, the
>> devices may be detected in a different order from that of RHEL5. The
>> second issue means that devices were coming up in a non-consistent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv6-beta-list mailing list
> rhelv6-beta-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
>




More information about the rhelv6-beta-list mailing list