[rhelv6-beta-list] Apache benchmark RHEL 5 vs. RHEL 6

William Warren hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
Tue Nov 9 21:40:31 UTC 2010


On 11/9/2010 4:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:58:12PM -0500, Ashley Penney wrote:
>>> One thing to consider is the 'nobarrier' option for ext4 - apparently
>>> makes
>>> a big performance difference.
>> This is probably it. This was discussed ad infinitum when it was
>> changed upstream, and caused a huge performance regression across
>> pretty much every workload.
> But don't barriers affect mostly writes? If yes, is it because of the logs
> and atime? 80% still looks like too much, maybe it's so bad because of the
> virtualized environment?
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv6-beta-list mailing list
> rhelv6-beta-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
no because both were run in the same virtualized environment.




More information about the rhelv6-beta-list mailing list