[rhelv6-list] Restricting bugzillas

[John Haxby]

On 14 January 2012 09:27, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:

> On 01/13/2012 09:22 PM, William Warren wrote:
> > That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default
> > for an open source product.  Ever since the current CEO came in RH has
> > been getting more and ore secretive and this goes against the spirit of
> > Open Source.
>
> is that really the case ? I see thousands of bz's against RHEL6 publicly
> visible. Some which were filed in the last day or so. What product do
> you see this against ?
>
>
The bugs you can see are, of course, the ones that are publicly viewable.
However, pick, say, the most recent ones referred to by the kernel
changelog and I'll bet that a large proportion of those aren't viewable.
Likewise the bugs explicitly referred to from the corresponding errata.

jch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/attachments/20120116/53a6841f/attachment.htm>