[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Core 2 wishlists

Hash: SHA1


On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Paul Heinlein wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 07:08, seth vidal wrote:
> > > That's nice. Then you can package it up for yourself. But 1. it's not
> > > allowed to be redistributed in that way 2. it's got some other issues
> > > that the pkg maintainer from red hat has worried with.
> >
> > Hrm, Mike Harris seems to disagree with that statement (on IRC).  Can
> > you show me where in the pine license it states you can't redistribute
> > patched binaries?
> See the FAQ, esp. section 10.1:
>   10.1 Is Pine Open Source?
>   It depends on how that term is defined. Source for Unix Pine is
>   provided to allow users and system administrators to customize and
>   adapt Pine for their own requirements. UW's Pine license allows
>   anyone to download source code for Unix Pine and make modifications
>   for their own local use without asking permission. Anyone can also
>   create and distribute patch files to implement bug fixes or minor
>   enhancements without asking permission. However, redistribution of a
>   modified version of Pine requires explicit permission from the
>   University of Washington.
>   [http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/legal.html]

So what's so difficult about simply asking for permission then? That's
what SuSE did, and their version of Pine includes quite a number of

- -- 
 Lenz Grimmer <lenz mysql com>
 Senior Production Engineer
 MySQL GmbH, http://www.mysql.de/
 Hamburg, Germany

 For technical support contracts, visit https://order.mysql.com/?ref=mlgr
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]