[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Kernel Modules in Fedora -x

Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:34:49 -0500
>> Les Mikesell <lesmikesell gmail com> wrote:
>>> Can you - or someone - comment on whether you'd trust it with your 
>>> working copy of something important?
>> All my development happens on Fedora, I push the code up to hosted.fp.o
>> periodically.  The only real thing stopping me from having more on
>> Fedora is the timeline.  There are servers that I just don't want to
>> touch, save for the few updates that apply to that install set, for
>> years, and for that I have RHEL, the Long Term Fedora.  Everything else
>> is Fedora.
> My "day job" is RHEL kernel stuff. And yet, my personal web and mail
> server, home file server, home workstation, office workstation and
> laptop all run Fedora (and F7 at the oldest now). I most definitely
> trust Fedora with my working copy of something important -- like the
> PITA backport patches I'm working on for the RHEL kernel... ;)

Oh, just saw Jesse's reply and read further up the thread... The "it"
was the new firewire stack, not Fedora, right?

FWIW, I do have a few firewire hard drives and a firewire dvd burner
that all work just fine with the new stack, haven't had any issues
whatsoever. (anything firewire that touches libavc1394, libraw1394 or
libiec61883 is another issue though...)

Jarod Wilson
jwilson redhat com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]