[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: answer



On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:

> Konstantin Svist wrote:

> > So, PLEASE, make sure that any new message that you write to the list is
> > either:
> > * a reply to an already-established thread of conversation (without changing
> > the subject line),
> > * or the message is self-contained, preferably with a descriptive subject
> >
> > The message I'm replying to is VERY confusing, and it takes a lot
> > of time to understand what you're talking about.

>    The message had 2 subjects. There were two lines of words. I
> could have put the whole of the work Maxwell did with wave theory.
> Would this be better?

god help us all, karl doesn't even know what a "subject" is.

rday

p.s.  yes, karl, i'm "stupid."  i figured i might as well just get
that over with to save you the trouble of posting it yourself.

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]