[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: answer



On 11/3/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday crashcourse ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Karl Larsen wrote:
>
> > Konstantin Svist wrote:
>
> > > So, PLEASE, make sure that any new message that you write to the list is
> > > either:
> > > * a reply to an already-established thread of conversation (without changing
> > > the subject line),
> > > * or the message is self-contained, preferably with a descriptive subject
> > >
> > > The message I'm replying to is VERY confusing, and it takes a lot
> > > of time to understand what you're talking about.
>
> >    The message had 2 subjects. There were two lines of words. I
> > could have put the whole of the work Maxwell did with wave theory.
> > Would this be better?
>
> god help us all, karl doesn't even know what a "subject" is.
>
> rday
>
> p.s.  yes, karl, i'm "stupid."  i figured i might as well just get
> that over with to save you the trouble of posting it yourself.


There in lies the danger of lowering the bar of entry into Linux.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]