[Rhm-users] RHM performance

[Andy Grove]

Just to clarify my usage - the client was using the jars from the rhm beta release in both cases.

Thanks.

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Sim <gsim at redhat.com>

Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:49:49 
To:Alan Conway <aconway at redhat.com>
Cc:Andy Grove <andy at codesuccess.com>, rhm-users at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Rhm-users] RHM performance


Alan Conway wrote:
>  From my reading of Andy's mail, I thought he was comparing the Qpid 
> trunk Java broker with RHM (essentially the Qpid trunk C++ broker) using 
> the same Java client for both. In that case both tests are using 0-10.

There is no qpid java broker that supports 0-10, the java broker on 
trunk speaks 0-8. The java client on trunk can speak both 0-8 and 0-10. 
When communicating with the java broker it will use 0-8, when 
communicating with the c++ broker it will communicate using 0-10.