[rhos-list] RHOS and Ceph

[Steven Ellis]

Gluster / RHS is actually spot on for the object and file centric use
cases at present.

And then traditional SAN for the high I/O block device.

Steve

On 04/20/2013 04:11 AM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> Support for ceph is being discussed.
> Have you tried Gluster - does that address your use case?
>
> Aic
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     *From: *"Thomas Oulevey" <thomas.oulevey at cern.ch>
>     *To: *rhos-list at redhat.com
>     *Sent: *Friday, April 19, 2013 5:00:26 AM
>     *Subject: *Re: [rhos-list] RHOS and Ceph
>
>     Hi,
>
>     On 04/19/2013 08:03 AM, Steven Ellis wrote:
>
>         So I've got a customer very excited about our RHOS
>         announcements and RDO and they are a potential for our early
>         adopter program.
>
>
>     We are as well excited to get ceph working with RHEL6.X/RHEL7
>     Frist step, the missing bit is the "qemu-kvm" package compile
>     against rbd.
>
>     Does anyone can share some updates ?
>
>     (Feature request BZ921668.)
>
>     -- 
>     Thomas.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rhos-list mailing list
>     rhos-list at redhat.com
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhos-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhos-list mailing list
> rhos-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhos-list


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhos-list/attachments/20130420/1c018caa/attachment.htm>