[rhos-list] Virbr0 Interface.

[Dave Allan]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 04:45:28AM +0200, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Dave Allan <dallan at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:00:32AM +0200, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Dave Allan <dallan at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Note that on recent Fedora the default network is a separate package
> > > > libvirt-daemon-config-network which should simply not be installed if
> > > > the default network is not desirable.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Interesting. So the upstream Nova Puppet module simply installs libvirt
> > and
> > > openstack-nova-compute. Does that mean libvirt-daemon-config-network will
> > > not be installed? Or is libvirt now a metapackage that draws it all in?
> > And
> > > if so, what package(s) should be installed instead?
> >
> > Yes, libvirt is now a metapackage.
> >
> > Double check me on this, but I think we just want
> > libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu which pulls in only:
> >
> >  libvirt-client
> >  libvirt-daemon
> >  libvirt-daemon-driver-network
> >
> 
> Will give that a try when I find the time. So that will be Fedora >= 20
> (i.e. current Rawhide and later), right? And I figure in RHEL 7, too? Just
> so I can cover both in one patch while at it.

It's definitely in F19 and RHEL7; I'm not sure about F18, but it was
broken out a while back, I just don't remember the exact date.

Dave

> -- Sandro
> 
> 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sandro
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
> > > > > FYI, I went ahead and proposed a change to implement this:
> > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41319/
> > > > >
> > > > > Note, that I only just had the time to test it on F19.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Sandro
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 02/28/2013 07:58 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
> > > > > > > On 02/28/2013 02:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 07:12:38PM +0000, Minton, Rich wrote:
> > > > > > >>> Is the virbr0 interface required and if not how do I get rid of
> > > > it? It
> > > > > > seems to spin up another dnsmasq process that interferes with
> > > > VlanManger
> > > > > > networks.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Just do
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>  virsh net-destroy default
> > > > > > >>  virsh net-autostart --disable default
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Derek/Martin, does it make sense to do this as part of packstack
> > > > > > > installation?  If so a bug for this would be useful in bugzilla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Its certainly something we could add but I havn't ever seen virbr0
> > > > cause
> > > > > > problems the the networking that packstack sets up. Wouldn't be any
> > > > harm
> > > > > > to remove it anyways to avoid confusion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > rhos-list mailing list
> > > > > > rhos-list at redhat.com
> > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhos-list
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rhos-list mailing list
> > > > > rhos-list at redhat.com
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhos-list
> > > >
> > > >
> >