[rhos-list] Bypassing authentication

[Guolin Cheng]

Hi Steve,

 So, on page 56 of the document, it should be 'v3' instead of 'v3.0'?  That will be a quick fix, then.

 I'm just following the document for a under-the-hood installation evaluation, so that I can have a better understanding of Redhat Openstack in case of something goes south. If Grizzly version supports both version 2.0 API and version 3 API. Sure I'd like to have both enabled.

Thanks.
Guolin


On 6/26/13 6:31 PM, "Steve Gordon" <sgordon at redhat.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Perry Myers" <pmyers at redhat.com>
> To: "Guolin Cheng" <gcheng at salesforce.com>, "Adam Young" <ayoung at redhat.com>, "Alan Pevec" <apevec at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Hao Chen" <Hao.Chen at NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>, rhos-list at redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:53:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [rhos-list] Bypassing authentication
>
> On 06/26/2013 07:49 PM, Guolin Cheng wrote:
> > Hi Pete and all,
> >
> > Same problems on my evaluation site too.
> >
> > The document
> > /_Red_Hat_OpenStack-3-Installation_and_Configuration_Guide-en-US.pdf_/
> >  -- page 52 - instructs to create V3.0 service endpoints.
> >
> > But when I follow it and create v3.0 service endpoints, I see the same
> > problems when I run 'keystone user-list' or other commands.
> >
> > The dirty&quick fix worked here is to remove all the v3.0 endpoints from
> > mysql database directly. Before that I sourced the keystonerc file and
> > tried 'keystone endpoint-delete <v3.0_endpoint_ID>' operation but that
> > operation failed.
> >
> > After the clean up operation above, all the keystone operation works
> > without a glitch.
> >
> > Is this the upstream openstack Grizzly problem, or redhat packaging /
> > documenation issue? I followed the redhat installation documents step by
> > step exactly.
>
> Adding some keystone experts to the thread :)

Looking closer I think one of the issues is that in the endpoint definition I used "v3.0" instead of "v3". The other question I have for the Keystone gurus though is to support both versions of the API do you need both endpoint definitions, or only "v3"? If we can confirm this one way or another I will update the documentation.

Thanks,

Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhos-list/attachments/20130626/8cf71d41/attachment.htm>