[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what about APT-RPM?



On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:53:27AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 09:09, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:30:49AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > 2. yum isn't carrying much baggage with it so far. B/c yum is much
> > > younger than the total lifespan of apt-get (as a debian program and as
> > > an rpm updater) it doesn't have a lot of legacy and baggage that apt
> > > carries along. Yum has 7000 lines of code vs 40000 lines of code. A
> > > signficant difference if you want to add a feature or just get started
> > > understanding what's going on.
> > 
> > Right -- when I get a chance this summer, I have intentions of adding some
> > baggage to make dist-upgrade do the right thing with Obsoletes: loops. :)
> 
> hehe. If you can get out from under the zebra obsoletes gated obsoletes
> zebra loop w/o making the code horribly grotty I'll give you a prize.
> 
> :)

rpm -q --qf '%{packager}\n' zebra gated | xargs kill

Do I get the prize? ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de

Attachment: pgp00012.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []