[sos-devel] Fwd: Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

Bryn M. Reeves bmr at redhat.com
Tue Feb 21 10:21:05 UTC 2012


I lost the top of thread but this is another topic for our (soon-to-be
appointed or re-appointed :-) sos Fedora maintainer:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:56:25 +0100
From: Kévin Raymond <shaiton at fedoraproject.org>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>

Le mardi 21 févr. 2012 à 10:20:32 (+0100), Alan Pevec a écrit :
> 
> Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team
> approved on transifex?
> I see few teams hanging in requested state at
> https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/

They have probably not done all necessary steps:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Maintainer

But I am not sure if anyone take care of them in order to help growing
our community.
IMHO this is FLSCo related, we should probably handle new election after
the next release to refresh things. (Last election was on 2008).



-- 
Kévin Raymond
(Shaiton)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attached Message Part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 199 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/sos-devel/attachments/20120221/588d5f85/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Attached Message Part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/sos-devel/attachments/20120221/588d5f85/attachment.ksh>


More information about the sos-devel mailing list