[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] small license issues



On 05/31/2012 09:03 AM, Stephen Herr wrote:
On 05/31/2012 08:43 AM, Michael Calmer wrote:
1) rhnpush declared GPL v2 but no COPYING file

Would you add a COPYING file please?


2) spacewalk-setup license mix

The spec file states that the package is licensed under "GPLv2".
However, the README implies that the package is actually licensed under the
same terms as Perl, means Artistic License.

If this is true please say in specfile GPLv2 or Artistic-1.0 and provide the
COPYING and the Artistic License files with the package.


3) spacewalk-reports declared GPLv2 but contains no COPYING file

Would you add a COPYING file please?


4) spacewalk-utils declared GPLv2 but contains GPL-3.0+ licensed script

Please verify and change the spec to GPLv2 and GPLv3+ and provide both COPYING
files with the package.

I've created a bug to track these problems, I'll work on getting them fixed today.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827022

-Stephen

Or maybe not today, since this is not as urgent as I thought it was.

-Stephen


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]